Nevada’s #1 Newspaper: “Plans for 70,000 at Burning Man draw little opposition”

Further coverage on the permit size issue, this time from the Las Vegas Review Journal, Nevada’s #1 newspaper.

Regular readers of this blog have heard it all before, here are some highlights

BY MARTIN GRIFFITH
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Posted: Apr. 8, 2012 | 1:59 a.m.

RENO — When it drew much smaller crowds in the 1990s, the Burning Man festival generated strong opposition from the Sierra Club and others over its impact to the Northern Nevada desert.

But with an April 16 deadline looming for public comment, organizers’ request to boost the maximum allowable crowd size by 20 percent to 70,000 is attracting only scant opposition .

Sierra Club activist Tina Nappe of Reno attributes the reversal of the position to Burning Man organizers’ track record of cleaning up and addressing environmental concerns at the largest outdoor arts festival in North America.

Black Rock LLC, which runs the weeklong celebration of self-expression and self-reliance leading up to Labor Day, recognizes the desert environment has limitations and strives to minimize environmental impacts, she said.

Full article:

http://www.lvrj.com/news/plans-for-70-000-at-burning-man-draws-little-opposition-146576145.html

10 comments on “Nevada’s #1 Newspaper: “Plans for 70,000 at Burning Man draw little opposition”

  1. Pingback: BREAKING: More tickets! BLM issues special permit for 60,900 | Burners.Me Burning Man commentary blog

  2. Pingback: Deadline for Art Car registrations this Tuesday | Burners.Me Burning Man commentary blog

  3. Pingback: Washington Post: “The Mainstream Republican Values of Burning Man” | Burners.Me Burning Man commentary blog

  4. Pingback: SF Examiner: “BLM Citation was issued in October” | Burners.Me Burning Man commentary blog

  5. Pingback: “Not just a party in the desert”: Burning Man makes its case on Capitol Hill | Burners.Me Burning Man commentary blog

  6. Pingback: How could we increase population, without increasing problems on the road and at the gate? | Burners.Me Burning Man commentary blog

  7. Pingback: How could we increase population, without increasing problems on the road and at the gate? | Burners.Me Burning Man commentary blog

  8. Pingback: Armchair detective: the case for skullduggery | Burners.Me Burning Man commentary blog

  9. Pingback: False Accusations? Bobzilla questions Burners.Me, “where’s the evidence?” | Burners.Me Burning Man commentary blog

  10. Pingback: The World’s 10 Biggest Parties | Burners.Me Burning Man commentary blog

Leave a Reply