A couple of weeks ago we brought you news of Burning Man: The Musical – a new Kickstarter project. It seems the idea is ramping up fast, with a big profile from the Reno Gazette-Journal.
The man behind the idea has never been to Burning Man. Does that make him a pre-Burner?
The musical is the brainchild of Matt Werner, a 30-year-old New York City-based Google employee who has never been to Burning Man. This year will be his first.
The Oakland, Calif. native — a former “hacker house” resident and a friend to many Silicon Valley hipster techies — admits that he sees the irony: A virgin Burner orchestrates a musical version of the world’s favorite desert Utopian festival that he has never been to.
His own story seems to be a little bit reflected in the plot of the unborn musical. The story line focuses on a 25-year old techie named Joe who lives in San Francisco and commutes down to Silicon Valley.
Joe goes to Burning Man one year and it disappoints initially.
Who wants to dance with a sparkle pony, right?
“His lofty ambitions to network with high-powered executives are not met. Between getting dumped by his girlfriend, dancing with sparkle ponies, and nearly dying while on a vision quest in the desert, he reaches a real low,” according to Werner’s web page.
“In the midst of this low, the acceptance, connection, and playfulness he experiences at Burning Man make him start to question his past life of ambition and power in Silicon Valley. The sharing economy and free spirits he meets in the desert make him wonder--is his real mission in life just to make money? Or is it maybe to authentically connect with others and help others?” the synopsis reads.
The RGJ asks the hard-hitting questions:
Q: Are you going to be critical at all of Burning Man and its direction? Is this just about a trip to Burning Man, about Burning Man? Or is it about Burning Man and its direction today?
I’m using “Book of Mormon” as a model. It does satirize the Mormon faith, but it does celebrate it too. It’s laughing with them, and not at them. It is going to be a satirical piece. It’s going to be a musical comedy. I mean, people recognize the absurdity of the festival. It is going to be a celebration of the values, and about the conflict between Silicon Valley and Black Rock City.
Q: Which side of that conflict are you on?
For me, I live in multiple worlds. I’ve worked at Google for five years, but I’m going to go to Burning Man. What is interesting to me, this notion of utopia. Some people I know, they believe that technology will solve all the world’s problems. Then there’s this other version of utopia, where we’re really in tune with ourselves. What I think is fascinating is seeing these worlds collide. I’ve lived in both of them. I used to live with these Russian programmers living in this “hacker house” pad. But we’ve had these really deep, meaningful conversations about all of this. Some of the media depictions have really hammed up the influence of these guys.
Q: So, do these techies come back changed people? Can you be a Google guy, or a tech savant, and be a true Burner too?
If you’re a billionaire, can you really say you’re a Burner? I really don’t know. Working at Google, the co-founders, they’ve all been to Burning Man. Some of the Silicon Valley people that go — some of the guys, they’re going to hook up with girls, and do drugs, and dance. There’s others who are radically transformed, and who do decide to find other work. I don’t have a statement I am trying to make: Silicon Valley, bad; Burning Man, good, or vice versa
[Read the rest of the story at the Reno Gazette-Journal]
There’s a conflict between Silicon Valley and Black Rock City? Could’ve fooled me. But perhaps that is the ironic premise for this Big Farce. Donate here if you want to find out.
Pingback: Victory for the Little Guy! [Update] | Burners.Me: Me, Burners and The Man
Pingback: Suing For Your Supper | Burners.Me: Me, Burners and The Man
Pingback: Too Loud For Burning Man Part II: Dictators in a Dysfunctional Dystopia | Burners.Me: Me, Burners and The Man
Pingback: Humboldt General Reveals Details of Medical Split | Burners.Me: Me, Burners and The Man
I really don’t give a shit if it turns out good. Plenty of great art has been created by first-timers. The thing I object to is all the goddamn coverage of the process, and not just of this project. Not to mention the goddamn Kickstarters/Indie-GoGo etc. It’s attention pollution.
“I really don’t know.” At least he got it right once. That should have been his answer to all the questions.
So now the NV burn has turned into nothing but something for people to project on it whatever they like, making it whatever they want it to be. Why bother going? Reality bytes.
When does the Burning Man video game come out?
Perhaps it’s easier to monetize it if you’ve never been (and therefore never entered into their implicit contract with the tickets assigning them all your IP rights). Or maybe the alternative media coverage of Burning Man on the Web these days is so good, people don’t even need to attend the NV.Burn these days to become Burners! 😉
“Implicit contract?”
It’s similar to a software license. Because you click “I agree” to something on the screen, user agreements imply that you have entered into a contract with the software manufacturer and you accept all the terms in their contract unedited.
In a similar fashion, Decommodification LLC , and their licensed franchise the Burning Man Project, believe that you have entered into a binding legal contract with them when you purchase a ticket and use it to enter the event, and that you have agreed to all the terms of that contract without variation. This extends to their intellectual property policy, and their ownership of their customers’ photos, videos, and perhaps one day ideas.
Most Burners have not signed any actual contract with BMOrg, however by attending BMOrg considers that they have. This is the “implicit contract”. Even if you are Gifted a ticket, BMOrg would consider you bound in this contract the same as any other Burner.
Although these types of agreements run the world, they have not been challenged in court very much; to date, I don’t think BMOrg have had to rely on the contract very much. When a guy jumped into the fire there was a test of the “you voluntarily assume the risk of serious injury or even death” clause, which held up for them.
Perhaps I should have said “IMPLIED contract?” The ticket seems to be an explicit contract assigning all your IP to Decommodification LLC. The concept that a play “Fire Guy”(tm) would be outside this agreement as long as the authors never actually went to the NV burn is fun.