MOOP-n-play

Earlier today, we brought you news of another contributor to the online discussions of Burning Man, justburn.us. Their posts, while seeming credible, are actually satire. Which is amusing to us here at Burners.Me, who are always dealing with trolls and shills saying “your site is all rumors”, “your site has no credibility”, etc. One wonders if this is not the latest information warfare tactic from the BMOrg, creating false sites that seem kind of credible but are really 100% bullshit, so that they can then say “there are a lot of fake blogs about Burning Man on the Internet, they’re full of lies and rumors”. Mind War 1.01.

moopnplayWe think that most of our audience are smart enough to understand that when we say it’s a rumor, that doesn’t mean it’s not true, it just means it’s from a trusted source but we don’t have a second source of verification…yet. At least we’re telling you that. These wannabe sites lie to you outright, and expect you to deduce that it’s satire. Then, if we don’t promote them, they get butt-hurt. It almost seems like a lame-ass effort from BMOrg to discredit us. Maybe I’m  a paranoid conspiracy theorist, but we definitely get more than our fair share of info-war trolls coming to this blog, hating on anything we post that shows the true nature of BMOrg, and parroting party lines without providing arguments based on logic and reason to support their positions. So, I wouldn’t put it past them to create a couple of bullshit sites so they could then attempt to discredit “online sites blogging about Burning Man” as “rumor mills”.

Anyway, here’s another one for you, MOOP-n-play. They claim that Steve Jobs was at Burning Man this year, and that Burning Man is moving to Dubai. 

1683901-burning-man-gets-its-own-iphone-app-updated-rotatorAs a back-up plan, Sheikh Zayed is reportedly in a position to make an offer to BMorg to buy all 60K+ tickets for the 2014 event and distribute them through his own S.T.E.H.P. program (that’s Sheikh’s Tickets for Exotic Hotties Program).   A spokesman noted, “if we cannot come to some agreement to move the event to Dubai, we’re willing to meet BMorg half way. Obviously, the ticket redistribution may lock out some less attractive and/or male burners, but those dozen girls you see in all the pictures hanging off the Robot Heart bus should not be affected.  The Sheikh says that they are always welcome to see the inside of his tent.”

This is what we’re up against, Burners. These are the type of people who try to discredit us with fake sites laden with bullshit rumors. Aren’t monopolies lovely? They really care about us.

 

Larry Harvey Called to Congress?

justburnusWe welcome new Burner site justburn.us to the blogosphere. It’s great to see the Burner community continuing to develop  outside the party, and to have more voices joining the conversation about the future of Burning Man.

They seem to have a number of scoops, with a mole on the inside of the recent Burning Man 4-day offsite summit.

Larry Harvey has been asked to testify before a Congressional Committee whose motto is “Blow the whistle on fraud and abuse”. From justburn.us:

WASHINGTON DC – In an interesting development the founder of the Burning Man art and music festival was listed as one of those called to speak at an upcoming meeting of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. 
 
While the exact substance of the testimony that Mr. Harvey is to give is unclear a source close to the matter said that it had to do with questions relating to an obscure US Code. Under title 50 sub-chapter 4 section 842 of US Code those groups or parties that are considered to be subsidiaries or successors to the former communist party are forbidden certain rights and freedoms. It is unclear how Burning Man has any relation to any successor or subsidiary but it has been theorized by an individual who was formerly a Burning Man staffer that the concern comes from the recently announced discussion at Columbia University about Burning Man as a religious and philosophical movement, a talk that is to be moderated by someone from the Department of Religion. Commenting on the information the unnamed former staffer had this to say:

While I cannot get in to exact details I will say that Black Rock City LLC has long had a history of speaking in public about aspirations for Burning Man that were global and for drastic world change. Larry Harvey himself is quoted as speaking about this in many papers. I wouldn’t be surprised if his call to DC has something to do with that.

In an attempt to corroborate these claims a source provided information that seems to imply that a Title 50 Chapter IV S 842 violation might be the item of concern that has resulted in those in Washington DC calling for a hearing. This is some of the information that this source provided: 

“needless to say we’re ambitious and we think we can effect the course of things in this century, we hope to” -larry harvey

“my partners are thinking beyond our lifetimes in doing it, it is a bit of a legacy project, which is really interesting, a very interesting exercise and then we’re saying 100 years, and that’s an interesting thing because if you do that it makes you think differently about the present, and so what would make something that durable, what will keep it alive that long, well, we’ve seen we’ve been alive and grown for a quarter of a century so it doesn’t seem like hubris to imagine an entire century at all” -larry harvey

“… commandeer some part of the public environment and make your own show, create your own rules, and then, before the authorities [show] up, … melt away back into the jungle. It is an anarchist notion … all that you can do is fight these little guerrilla battles …” -larry harvey

While it is hard to say the true intent behind these supposed calls to change the world through Burning Man, it appears that those in congress want to know more. Considering that Burning Man takes place on federal land it is likely within their scope to ask questions about what their intentions are. Though it is unclear what will come out of these hearings many feel that this is nothing but a witch hunt.

Justburn are thinking that this is going to be something that is against Burning Man, but maybe not. Maybe this is about all the agencies trying to get their slice of the Burning Man money pie.

.

 

They also have another big scoop. They suggest that the Temple will be moved to a different location, and its burn will be treated as a religious ceremony so fines can be given out for people causing disturbances.

Marian Goodell, director of business and communications for BRC LLC, who appeared to avoid the question of obscenity as it related to nudity and free expression, feels that the greatest impact to the event could be the Chapter 201 violations that would relate to The Temple. Though some changes to the location of The Temple would be required to fully adhere to state law she feels that applying the law could be a benefit to the community, in a prepared statement she had this to say on behalf of the LLC:

Upon further review of the pertinent law and participant feedback we feel that this might result in a win for our community. For years people have complained about distractions during the Temple Burn. The continued distractions and recent rise in drone use has given us cause to act on behalf of the community. We feel that using the power of state law, in partnership with local law enforcement, can ensure those who cherish the solemnity of the Temple Burn will continue to find what they seek.

An individual who has information regarding the changes made available a document that goes on to list the possible changes to The Temple burn and the justifications for any participant impact. It shows that BRC LLC intends to use the provisions under Chapter 201 section 270, which deals with disturbing religious meetings, to enact the changes many have called for in yearly feedback. The regulations under NRS 201.270 state that the following infractions would quality as a misdemeanor under state law and would be enforced to protect community interests.

Every person who shall willfully disturb, interrupt or disquiet any assemblage or congregation of people met for religious worship by noisy, rude or indecent behavior, profane discourse, either within the place where such meeting is held, or so near it as to disturb the order and solemnity of the meeting; shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.

In order to further comply with the extended provisions of the regulation BRC LLC will move The Temple further out to ensure that it complies with NRS 201.280, which prohibits the distribution of alcoholic beverages within 1 mile of any camp or field meeting for religious worship during the time any such meeting is being held.Some feel that the much asked for changes to The Temple burn are a way to cover up the impending First Amendment restrictions that attendees can expect when state obscenity laws are fully enforced.
.
They also had a high-level source inside a closed room meeting of the 6 BMOrg principals:
SONOMA – In a closed door meeting the six members representing Black Rock City LLC, which is responsible for the annual Burning Man arts and music festival, agreed that mistakes had been made regarding their annual financial disclosures to the Burning Man community. A high level source attending the 4-day long offsite “Staff Retreat”, where staffers and organizers examine “the state of Burning Man”, confirms that event founder Larry Harvey became aware of the issue last week when a newly hired intern was doing an internal audit of the Afterburn website, where the financial data is posted.
 
Representatives from the six member board of Black Rock City LLC itself could not be reached to comment on the exact details of the mistakes that were made, as the retreat is ongoing, but an individual who wished to remain anonymous was quoted as saying:

It had been going on for 10 years or more, and I cannot believe nobody noticed sooner.

Sources close to the LLC reveal that the mistakes made are likely related to the possible intentional redaction of information about the multimillion-dollar corporations sources of income in the annual financial reports released to the public. Public records show that since at least 2001 the Financial Charts released by Black Rock City LLC show only expenditures, leaving out an itemized list of income sources.
 
In a prepared statement released this morning Marian Goodell, Director of Business and Communications, had this to say:

We at Burning Man value transparency. At the heart of our shared ethos is Decommodification. We believe that this founding principle guides us in creating an event free from the concerns of profit making and we strive to protect our community from those who would exploit it for financial gain. It is unfortunate that for over 10 years we have not been reporting the sources of our income and we will get to the bottom of how that happened. We are committed to doing right by our community and expect to have this matter resolved soon, holding whomever was responsible for the oversight to account.

Long held up as an example of financial transparency and goodwill on the part of Black Rock City LLC it is unclear how the lack of income disclosure on the annual financial reports released to the public went unnoticed for so long. With the annual staff retreat wrapping up soon sources close to the LLC claim that a series of resignations is likely.
.
I should point out, that all of these posts had the tag “satire” attached to them. Well done, they almost had me fooled until I got to the bit about the resignations.

Dr Burner

Here’s a good news story. One of those classic “Burner trips and makes good” type of stories, that you don’t read so much in the New York Times.

A Burner went to Amsterdam and did a ton of acid and ecstasy (aka, “candy flipping”), and developed a whole new sense of identity in a gay trance club. Then, he took over the family business, and turned sales from $5 million to $64 million. He implemented a rule that no executive could earn more than 5 times the lowest paid worker – brilliant. Then he channeled the company’s profits into activism, fighting against GMO’s and mega-corporations and the DEA – and winning.

This dude is my new hero! Hope to see you at the Burn Dr Bronner. From Mother Jones (via Boing Boing)

It’s midmorning at the hive of cheap buildings that serves as the global HQ of Dr. Bronner’s Magic Soaps, and, as usual, David Bronner isn’t working on anything to do with soap. Sure, his phone is ringing off the hook with business calls and a rep from Trader Joe’s is visiting tomorrow, but the 40-year-old CEO—who looks like a 6-foot-5 raver version of Captain Jack Sparrow—could care less. A Burning Man amulet dangles on a hemp necklace over his tie-dye shirt as he leans in toward his computer screen, staring at what really matters to him: the latest internal poll results for Washington Initiative 522, a ballot measure that would require the labeling of foods containing genetically modified organisms.

The initiative, which Washingtonians will vote on tomorrow, is one of the costliest in state history: Its proponents have spent a little more than $7 million, while their opponents in biotech and agribusiness have poured in $22 million.* Dr. Bronner’s has donated a whopping$1.8 million to the Yes on 522 campaign. (That’s on top of $620,000 it gave in support of asimilar California ballot measure last year.) At stake, Bronner says, is consumers’ right to decide what they put in their bodies. “If we don’t win the right to label and enable people to choose non-GMO, then everything is going to be GMO.”

131105bronner…Embracing lefty lifestyle politics might not seem like the best way to grow a business—until you sit on the orange [pornj? – ed] velour couch in Bronner’s Tibetan-flag-draped office in Escondido and watch the phone light up with calls from buyout firms. In the 15 years since Bronner took over, annual sales have grown 1,300 percent, from $5 million to $64 million. Along the way, the company’s castile soaps have gone from hippie niche products to staples on the aisles at Target. And yet Bronner has twice refused offers from Walmart to carry his soaps, even at full price, because he can’t stomach the chain’s politics and crummy worker pay and benefits. The best way to go mainstream, he has found, is to be as unapologetically countercultural as possible.

…”Dr. Bronner’s has always stood out on its own,” says Joel Solomon, the president of Renewal Partners, a venture capital firm that invests in socially responsible businesses. “Their activism as a company is not engineered; it wasn’t coached by a public relations firm. It is the real thing. Dr. Bronner’s does their thing the way they think it should be done and nobody is going to change them.”

The back story is quite interesting:
Dr. Bronner…Bronner’s grandfather, Emanuel Heilbronner, was born into a German Jewish family of soap factory owners in 1908 and immigrated to the United States in 1929. His parents died in Nazi concentration camps, and he dropped “Heil” from his last name because of its associations with Hitler. More interested in godliness than cleanliness, Bronner—not really a doctor—invented a Judeo-Unitarian pop religious philosophy, publicizing its tenets on the labels of the soap bottles that he gave away at his lectures. He became so obsessed with spreading his All-One faith that he and his sickly wife put their three children in foster homes for long stretches so he’d have more time to travel and speak. In 1945 he was arrested after a particularly fervent speech at the University of Chicago and committed to a mental hospital. He escaped and fled to Los Angeles, where he founded Dr. Bronner’s All One God Faith, which now does business as Dr. Bronner’s Magic Soaps.“The soap was there to sell his message,” David Bronner tells me, “and if you didn’t want to hear it, he didn’t want to sell to you.” Emanuel Bronner’s cosmic ideals and his soap’s 18 suggested uses (including as a contraceptive douche—since removed) found a following on communes and hiking trails, even though Bronner wasn’t exactly a flower child; he hated communists and never smoked pot. Bronner’s son, Jim, rejected his father’s mystical ramblings and went to work for a chemical company, where he developed a firefighting foam for Monsanto (it doubles as fake snow on movie sets). But in 1988, he stepped in to rescue Dr. Bronner’s Magic Soaps after it lost its nonprofit status and declared bankruptcy, recapitalizing it as a for-profit company.

“The activism side of the company enables us to take risks that no sane company would.”
These guys are nuts, huh? Just what I’ve been looking for in my soap provider.

blondtronAt first, David Bronner (Jim’s son) wasn’t sure he wanted to become the next standard-bearer for the soap-making clan. After graduating from Harvard in 1995 with a biology degree, he wound up in Amsterdam and immersed himself in its psychedelic drug culture. “I just had my life explode on many levels of identity,” he recalls about a late-night ecstasy and LSD trip at a gay trance club. These experiences and a lot of reading eventually opened his eyes to the value of his grandfather’s All-One philosophy, and the power of the soap company as a vehicle for change. In 1997, he let his dad know that he was ready to work for the family business, but only “on activist terms.” A year later, his father died of lung cancer and Bronner, at the age of 25, became the new CEO.

Early on, Bronner decided that he’d rather feel good about his job than worry about making a ton of money. In 1999, he capped the company’s top salary at five times that of the lowest-paid warehouse worker. He employs a lot of people he met at Burning Man, including Tim Clark* (official title: Foam Maestro), a buff guy whose job mostly consists of driving a psychedelically painted foam-spewing fire truck to music festivals, which is about as close as the company gets to actual marketing.

Backing hemp gave him some problems with the DEA. So, he sued the DEA. And won. Then, he sued the giant corporations for pretending to be organic, and he won that too. Bad ass!

drbronnergirlsLimiting executive pay and spending virtually nothing on advertising left a lot of extra cash for improving the products and funding social campaigns—which have often gone hand-in-hand. For years, the soap had included an undisclosed ingredient, caramel coloring. As the new CEO, Bronner wanted to remove it for the sake of purity, but feared that die-hard customers would assume the new guy was watering down the product. So he decided to incorporate hemp oil, which added a caramel color while also achieving a smoother lather. But there was a hitch: A few months after he’d acquired a huge stockpile of Canadian hemp oil, the Bush administration outlawed most hemp products. “Technically, we were sitting on tens of thousands of pounds of Schedule I narcotics,” Bronner recalls.

Rather than destroy the inventory, he sued the Drug Enforcement Agency to change its stance on hemp, which comes from a nonpsychoactive strain of cannabis. Adam Eidinger, who now heads the company’s activism efforts in Washington, DC, served DEA agents at agency HQ bagels covered with poppy seeds (which, in theory, could be used to make heroin) and orange juice (which naturally contains trace amounts of alcohol). In 2004, a federal court handed Bronner a victory, striking down the ban and allowing him to keep his stores of hemp oil.

The success of the hemp campaign convinced Bronner to push his company ever closer to the bleeding edge of the progressive movement. In 2003, Dr. Bronner’s became the world’s first soap company to win organic certification. Then it sued rival companies such as Kiss My Face and Estée Lauder that were using the “organic” label as window dressing. When Bronner couldn’t find certified organic and fair trade sources of palm, coconut, and olive oil, he created his own in Ghana and Sri Lanka, and scaled up small existing projects in Israel and Palestine. (His coconut oil business now accounts for 12 percent of company sales, almost as much as bar soap.)

Bronner has been arrested twice for his hemp activism—first in 2009 for planting hemp seeds on the DEA’s lawn to protest a ban on domestic cultivation, then last year for milling hemp oil in front of the White House inside a metal cage designed to thwart the cops. Now he’s talking about partnering with renegade American farmers to manufacture the nation’s first line of domestically grown hemp-based foods. Obviously, that sort of thing isn’t on the agenda of competing green brands owned by corporate multinationals. “The activism side of the company enables us to take risks that no sane company would,” Bronner notes. “But the point of what we are doing is to fight, and the products serve that.”