Jason Goodman “Crippled” By My Opening Legal Salvo

Playing the victim has brought Jason Goodman this far. A channel with 85,700 subscribers that he can’t stream to. A long list of burned bridges from former guests on his show that he later betrayed. A mounting number of lawsuits across the country.

We’re facing in 2020 an exciting leap year of intense political action. Will Jason be able to cover it live? Or will his days be spent pushing paper and sweating bullets over his increasingly numerous legal entanglements?

He’s talking about the copyright strike I gave him for doxxing my family. “Leave my family out of it” is a pretty reasonable and fair request, I would hope anyone would agree with that. If he chooses to ignore it then he must accept responsibility for the consequences of his decisions.

Sadly, instead of owning up to his actions Goodman chose a childish move, striking my video in petty retaliation – even though I didn’t play anything from his channel. I was forced to upload another one with the clips he objected to edited out:

It would be easy for Mr Goodman to do the same. Remove my copyrighted work from his video and re-upload it. Why does he choose lawsuits instead? Is the plan to tug on the heart strings of his audience to fund his pro se legal defenses with superchats? Perhaps Jason is looking longingly at the lucrative fundraising his frequent guest “Vabelle Danger” aka Robyn Gritz has been doing off her FBI wrongful dismissal claim. Her GoFundMe’s about to enter into its third year, even though the basis of her claim seems weak since she resigned in 2013 rather than being dismissed (she’s kept herself busy working at the Macy’s Cosmetics counter and as a Senior Fellow at the London Center for Policy Research).

Source: GoFundMe

Maybe Mr Goodman is seeing crowdsourced dollar signs after interviewing his other recent guest, the multi-million dollar king of them all, Sawman.

This stops child sex trafficking. Donate now. $2 million’s not enough

To remove his strike from my channel, I filed a counter-notification. Jason Goodman now has ten business days to file a new lawsuit against me, making his argument that playing modified versions of his clips from a comedy channel infringes his rights. It will be interesting to see what legal basis he comes up with, since the clips are marked parody which is specifically mentioned as acceptable Fair Use.


Outtrim v Goodman

Last week Jason Goodman filed an objection to my copyright claim.

The video linked is CryptoBeast #16 – Queen Tut Spills the Beans. I’m not aware of ANY false information in it, which is eyewitness testimony of a whistleblower formerly inside his operation whose story has been verified from multiple sources.

I might be a public figure, but the other person in the photograph is not. Nor is she an employee of a UN-linked agency.

Mr Goodman thinks he has the right to take peoples’ Facebook photos and display them in high definition without modification for two minutes on his channel, even if the images were privacy restricted to only be available on Facebook. Pretend to be someone’s friend so you can steal their photos, then monetize them on your stream while begging for donations and “pateon” subscriptions. He will be arguing in Court that the law somehow lets him do all of this, but I don’t think he will find much case law he can cite in support of this idea. Even if he could make a successful argument that showing a photo for minutes without specifically discussing it is somehow Fair Use, that doesn’t override the right to privacy.

YouTube’s legal process requires me to file a lawsuit against Jason Goodman to settle his dispute of my copyright claim. So I wrote to the Magistrate Judge in the most local of all his lawsuits, Sweigert v Goodman in the Southern District of New York asking permission to file a Motion to Intervene. The issues in the two cases are almost identical, because Jason Goodman doesn’t just occasionally behave like this, he has built his entire multi-national operation on a consistent and readily identifiable pattern of fake news, lies, defamation and smear campaigns – all of which I can prove with evidence that meets the Federal Standards.

Think I’m kidding? Here is evidence of an active whisper campaign he is doing right now, contacting people he sees me communicating with to smear my character. Unfortunately for him most of the people I like to associate with in the research community are actually researchers too. They have critical thinking and logic skills, and the sleight-of-mind tricks that work on Jason’s mostly boomer audience aren’t going to turn out the same way with them. You can see in this conversation how that went for him…

“He claims I was in Ukraine fomenting revolution in 2013” – I challenge Mr Goodman to provide a citation showing where I ever made that claim. The Maidan Revolution was actually in 2014. Was this a Freudian slip, revealing he was involved with AeroEscape LLC which was incorporated in 2013? You can read my coverage (evidence-backed, as always) at Insane in the Ukraine Part 3 – Sheep Dipping the Truther (also Part 1 and Part 2).


Battleground 1: Pink Umbrella Court

Here’s my letter to the Magistrate Judge in New York:

Address-Clean-Letter-Motion-to-Intervene-Steve-Outtrim-Case-SDNY-1-18-cv-08653-d2

Mr Goodman freaked out and immediately returned to his conspiracy theory defense.

magistrate-stewart-d-aaron-issues-ORDER-against-Jason-Goodman

This guy has no shame – he is gaslighting the Judge. He says “Outtrim wrote a declaration in support of the Plaintiff’s motion to intervene”. This is completely false, it’s not what happened at all. Jason as the Defendant wrote an Opposition to the Motion to Intervene in which he named myself, Titus Frost and a host of others in a vast (and vastly illogical) conspiracy theory, using likes on Steemit posts to somehow stop his “truth” from coming out. Several of us who were named in Goodman’s statement wrote letters to the Judge swearing under penalty of perjury (ie. voluntarily putting ourselves in legal jeopardy if we were lying) that his claims were completely false. Mine was titled “Statement in Response to Defendant’s Opposition to Motion to Intervene”. It was not in support of any Plaintiff motions. Nor was it in support of the intervenor-applicant. It was a direct response to the unsubstantiated nonsense in Jason Goodman’s Defendant’s Statement of Opposition. The Virginia Judge refused to let Goodman bring us into his suit, ruling that we were non-parties. Goodman is trying to twist these facts into a claim that I filed a Motion to Intervene in his Virginia case which was denied by the Judge – a complete lie.

The New York Judge didn’t waste any time, issuing an Order denying Jason’s motion for a deadline extension.

This greatly upset Jason. He has a YouTube channel to run, these pesky Judges’ Orders get in the way! So he seems to have thought “maybe if I send the Judge an email with some more conspiracy theory allegations, he’ll change his mind and grant an extension so I can really ‘Close In’ with Charles Motel”

Jason Goodman emailed the Judge:

Date: November 13, 2019 at 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: 1:18-cv-08653-VEC-SDA, Sweigert v. Goodman
Thank you your honor, however Mr. Outtrim’s inappropriate actions have revealed new evidence that is extremely significant and must be included in my answer.  Outtrim’s latest action provides further proof of the alleged conspiracy between Plaintiff and others including Outtrim. 

This causes me to request that you reconsider today’s order given the following circumstances:

Irrespective of Mr. Outtrim’s denial of intervention, his reason for attempting to intervene changes my answer and requires additional time to complete. Prior to emailing you inappropriately, Mr. Outtrim submitted a fraudulent complaint to YouTube that has crippled my online business by preventing me from live streaming my daily broadcasts to my audience of 85,000 viewers.  This has negatively impacted my income and is a clear example of the ongoing extrajudicial steps Plaintiff and his associates have taken in their persistent and escalating effort to disrupt my day to day life, my business and my ability to defend myself in this legal mater.

Online broadcasting is my full time job and primary source of income.  The YouTube penalty will continue indefinitely IF Outtrim is able to demonstrate to Google that he has an active lawsuit against me for the same claim he has submitted to YouTube.  It is extremely important to my defense that I have the additional time requested so I may adequately explain and present the relevant facts and details related to shed light on this newest development and so the court may consider these facts in rendering its decision.

I respectfully request that you reconsider the order and allow me the time extension.  I stand ready to submit another motion for extention of time if that would please the court.

Jason Goodman, Defendant Pro Se

Source: checkmatek2.net

“Crippled” his business? He is still Premiering his videos live, which means he should be able to receive superchats and talk directly to his audience. He never interacts with the chat on his show anyway, except to delete any “trolls” who dare to question the narrative, or to post the links for his subscriptions. I haven’t gone after his Patreon or Subscribestar accounts…yet. So how is his business hurt in any way? Meanwhile my family is suffering greatly from him doxxing my wife, and I am defamed per se by him accusing me of “murdering” someone who was hit by a car in a different country, whose death was ruled suicide by vehicle.

He is also directly lying to the Judge that the YouTube copyright strike penalty is indefinite. It’s for 90 days.

His logic doesn’t add up either. He says his business is crippled while the lawsuit is going on; yet he says he wants to delay the lawsuit and stretch it out longer.

Jason’s case is jumbled and confused, and it seems that he is trying the patience of the legal system. Reconsider the Order? Who does he think he is? The judge made another Order, slapping him down again:

Jason Goodman’s response to the Second Amended Complaint was due today, November 14. He was given a choice whether to file what he was asked to three weeks ago; or file another Motion for the Judge to reconsider his denial of an extension.

Jason filed another Motion, in which he lies to the judge again and gets his own pronouns confused.

This is plainly nonsense. Why would the Plaintiffs file a motion to intervene in their own case? As I pointed out earlier, I did not write anything in support of the intervenor-applicant. Defendant Jason Goodman brought up my name and I wrote a letter to the Court categorically denying all of his claims. There was no ruling from the Judge about frivolous claims or abuse of process. In fact, the Judge spent 7 pages of a 14-page Memorandum Opinion going through the legal basis of rejecting the Motion to Intervene. There would be no need to do that for a frivolous claim, she could have just denied the Motion.

Did Jason just copy and paste his latest New York Motion? Maybe from one of Klarry Layman‘s documents? Did his close pal Laura Loomer help out? Either that or the Tinder Predator is getting rather confused about how he identifies:

He also swore under penalty of perjury that he sent a letter via email to a physical post office:

This is what happens with liars – they just can’t help themselves.

Jason asked for a week extension. The Judge finally caved on this third attempt, granting Jason an extension – but only for the weekend.

jason-goodman-slander-libel-defamation-lawsuit-request

Can Mr Goodman see the rabbit hole he is digging for himself? The next stage of this case is the interrogatory discovery requests, due by next Thursday Nov 21.


Meanwhile, in Virginia

Jason Goodman recently had to appear in Court in one of the other defamation and slander lawsuits against him, Steele et al v Goodman et al in the Eastern District of Virginia.

He started out a bit confused:

The judge had to explain to the Defendant that he can’t give him legal advice:

There was a whole discussion about Goodman’s dick pics. He tried to get them taken out of the case, but it got shut down.

His claim that “I have never live-streamed a phone call with anyone without telling them” is another falsehood. I’ve personally witnessed him doing this to Laura Loomer (having an airport meltdown over her luggage), the New York Post and the Washington Post (where he used the social engineering technique of pretending to be someone else by using Kevin Marsden’s complaint ticket number). He also frequently records conversations without permission or even notification then broadcasts them, such as this one with Douglas Gabriel from American Intelligence Media.

By the end of his first day in Court, Goodman felt that anything he said would be inappropriate. The judge said that was probably true, since they were only there to set the trial date.

Source: Justia

It’s going to be a busy 12 months of legal responses for Mr Goodman. I hear there are other lawsuits pending for him too…including two I’m aware of in California. At some point wouldn’t it be better to go back to “truth”, like the title of his channel? Surely that is preferable to trying to frame people for murders of suicide victims, shutting down ports, training people how to modify household appliances into directed energy weapons, and the rest of his LARPing antics.

Reverse CSBS Investigation: David Hawkins

Jason Goodman has replaced self-proclaimed A.I. guru Quinn Michaels with self-proclaimed A.I. guru David Hawkins.

We’ve been checking out if this guy is who he says he is. Results have been mixed.

Rather than being simultaneously a “technophobe” and a “world expert on artificial intelligence and forensic economics”, he turns out to be a less successful version of George Webb – a computer sales guy prone to exaggerating his own accomplishments and telling fantastic, graphically detailed violence-laden gruesome stories of make believe as if they were God’s honest truth. Does Jason have a type?


Claims That Don’t Stack Up

  • Claims to have a degree from Cambridge with First Class Honours. Was unable to verify if he was a student between 1963-1967 because those records are no longer available. Christian Science Monitor article from 1984 mentions he is a graduate, but says nothing about honours. Former co-worker verified that he attended Cambridge.
  • Claims to have attended Cambridge University on a Foundation scholarship. Cambridge has no knowledge of this scholarship.
  • Claims to have graduated from Cambridge with a degree in Mechanical Engineering in 2 years. It’s a 4 year degree.
  • Claims to have blown up a diesel engine while an undergraduate at Cambridge. Diesel does not explode. Why not show his degree, rather than offering this unverifiable story as “proof”?
  • Claims to have bought his Masters’ degree for 5 pounds. This is not possible with degrees from Cambridge.
  • Claims to be a Forensic Economist. An actual forensic economist was found, who confirmed that a PhD is required for this profession because you are testifying in legal cases.
  • Claims to be a world expert in artificial intelligence and virtual reality simulations; in fact, other than a single paper in 1983 about expert systems, we could find no published academic papers or presentations at conferences. He turns out to have been working for the past 8 years in a parking lot picking up cigarette butts for $20 an hour. A butt-man.
  • Claims to have designed the HESPER system which was runner-up for the gold medal from the British Computer Society. There is no record of this on the BCS web site. The system was in fact designed and built by others, he worked on the tender for the project and failed in his attempt to license the technology for his own business.
  • Claims to have 2 patents in the field of artificial intelligence. In fact they are patent applications that were never granted in 30 years after filing. Neither is in the field of artificial intelligence. Both were registered well after the development and public debut of the HESPER system.

Who’s The Expert?

An expert system is more like Quora or Wikipedia than SIRI.

The paper presented at the Society of Petroleum Engineers in 1988 by R.C.A. Peveraro and J.A. Lee from Britoil Plc contains proof that the artificial intelligence expertise to create HESPER did not come from David Hawkins:

Hawkin’s patent application for the “Computer Paintbox System” is still pending after 30 years.

https://patents.google.com/patent/EP0369695A2

The patent application for the Deductive Computing Machine was withdrawn this week:

https://patents.google.com/patent/WO1991006051A1/en

https://patents.google.com/patent/GB8923103D0/en

According to Google, neither of these patents were granted.

It’s been 36 years since Hawkins published his only cited academic paper. “Publish or perish” is the rule in academia, and world experts usually are frequently invited to speak at conferences. We could find no evidence of any of this activity.


Forensic What?

No disrespect is meant to Field, Gobsmack, or anyone else at Abel Danger, who have promoted content from this blog before and appear to have been duped by Hawkins as much as anyone. They distanced themselves from him after he engaged with Jason Goodman, which has turned out to be a prescient move on their part.

Hawkins has not responded directly to any of the allegations against him, but has now removed “forensic economist” from his latest bio.

A 1951 insight into the strange (?) mind of David Hawkins.  When he was about 8 years old, David’s mother asked him why, when he walked back from his village school at Chartham near Canterbury, Kent, his trouser pockets would get so dirty. David explained that he was concerned that the pebbles in the ditches didn’t get to see the sun rise or set. He described how he would climb in the ditch, stuff his pockets with the pebbles, walk off the road and up a hill, brush the dirt off the pebbles, place them side by side along branches of trees with a good view of the sun going up or going down and leave the scene content in the knowledge of a good deed done to or for the pebbles. David’s mother understood!

Source: Reverse CSI Scripts web site

“Gays Did 9/11 For Carbon Credits”

Yes, that’s really what he’s saying. He claims on his Patreon page that events in the 1980’s and 1990’s were staged in a wide-ranging multinational LGBTQ conspiracy to profit from carbon credits, even though the Kyoto Protocol wasn’t signed until 1997 and carbon trading didn’t being until 2005.

Is this guy for real? Or is this just fantasy? 50 dead hookers at a pig farm…for carbon credits?


Due Diligence

Recently Agent SERCO and I tracked down a gentleman by the name of Ross, who was the Chief Operating Officer of Oilfield Systems Limited. He was able to confirm many aspects of David Hawkins’ identity. He put to bed speculation that the person speaking on Jason Goodman’s show now had assumed somebody else’s persona.

Ross has given me permission to post our email exchange. I am not publishing the header information to protect his privacy. The quotes below are copy and pasted verbatim, they have not been edited.


If anybody claimed outlandish things it was David Hawkins! He was both brilliant and incredible, funny and persuasive. I enjoyed my two times working with him. I’ll provide a potted history and hopefully answer your questions along the way. My Oilfield archive is back in Turkey (I am in UAE at the moment) so I can’t get all the details I’m afraid.

David was indeed a Cambridge graduate and had started out working with Schlumberger Wireline Services (had many funny stories about that life). He ended up in Schlumberger’s research centre somewhere in the USA, at quite a high management level I seem to recall. He formed Oilfield Expert Systems Ltd with support from Derek Cartwright, Managing Director of Scientific Computing (SCL). Here’s a ref to SCL dated ’89 that might be of passing interest: https://www.cbronline.com/news/revitalised_with_new_management_scientific_computers_raises_ukp1m_in_venture_funds/

So, the original company was Oilfield Expert Systems Ltd (known as OESL pronounced “ooze-ill”. It was founded in March 1984. I joined in the summer of ’86 after completing my MSc in Knowledge Based Systems at Uni Edinburgh. David had worked with Marconi and SCL to prepare the tender to Britoil to build a model-based expert system which became known as HESPER. By the time I joined there was a programming team based in Britoil in Glasgow equipped with Symbolics computers. David and I worked out of SCL’s office in Burgess Hill in Sussex. All the HESPER design was, as far as I know, in the original tender documents (which I think I still have) and so David’s, or at least OESL’s. The development team was headed by a brilliant LISP programmer but I forget his name. Maybe he coauthored the HESPER paper by Peveraro. As far as I know, Peveraro was the Britoil ‘expert’ who subsequently wrote the paper on Hesper that was published. I am not aware of any Statoil or DTI funding, though the latter would make sense. I recall HESPER winning some award but can’t confirm it was from BCS. I do not see it listed for 1988 at https://www.bcs.org/content/conWebDoc/1926

In 1987, the project in Glasgow came to an end. David had hoped that OESL would have the intellectual property rights and be able to commercialise HESPER. When Britoil refused, David was left with no choice but to let all the employees go. He worked alone for two years preparing an application for funding from DTI and a consortium of oil companies including Oxy, Bow Valley and Deminex for a new product, a geological workstation called GeoScene. A new team was brought on board in late 1989, in an office in Winchester, of which I was one. By 1992 the board and David decided to bring on board a new Managing Director, Glen Kendall, an American who had founded Terrasciences. David and I became the marketing and sales department. Glen decided to ditch the ‘expert’ in the name and so the company changed to Oilfield Systems Ltd in 1993. Glen also downplayed the whole expert assistant aspect of GeoScene. David left the company in 1995. He moved to Vancouver, and I met up with him a few years later at a petroleum show in Calgary where we were showing off GeoScene. I became COO and later, when Glen left suddenly, CEO. We had to wind up OSL in 2001 when oil was $12/bbl and our sales outlook was bleak. All employees transferred to Paradigm.

Your photo was a broken link in the email. My most recent search for David found this:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JyCeTosqBv0  His is the rightmost photo.


The ears, nose, eyes, face shape, chin, and area between nose and lip look completely different to me; however Ross personally knew this person, and says he has also validated his voice from an Abel Danger MH-370 broadcast.

Glad to have helped. Sure the right-hand photo is a young David! Yes, that was the last time I saw him, in Calgary in late 90’s. Laughed until I cried at his stories of tape worm infection and wireline ops in Australia.
Not seen any of his videos. But listened to his podcast about MH370. 
He was bitter about effectively being ousted by the very man he brought in to lead the company – reminiscent of Jobs and Sculley. Glen and most of the employees thought David was nuts. His ideas for a Deductive Computing Machine, which he patented, were indeed far fetched. But I still think his ideas of model-based expert systems, in contrast to rule-based (which everybody else was doing) were spot on. Even today in the realm of digital rock analysis, in which I have been involved these last nine years, I see the relevance of his ideas… more so with the recent renewed uptick in machine learning and AI.


David was laughed at because he suggested his DCM could one day be used to predict earthquakes. Funny, then, to receive from Kaggle just a few weeks ago news of an AI/ML contest to predict earthquakes from historic data. David was years ahead of the rest of us!! I used to think he lived a few feet off the ground… not tied down in his thinking as most people are. 

If World Expert Hawkins has been developing his A.I. technology for 35 years, why wouldn’t he enter it in this contest? Instead he appears to have withdrawn the long-dormant patent application in the face of scrutiny.

There’s some recent analysis of David Hawkins and Jason Goodenough’s LARPing at Tracking the Leopard Meroz.

Follow Agent SERCO, Prepper Kitty and CryptoBeast for completely free evidence-based research, instead of wild script ideas presented as “truth” for donations.


References

https://reversecsiscripts.com/about-us/

https://www.coasttocoastam.com/guest/hawkins-david/6781

https://www.abeldanger.org/tag/david-hawkins-bio/

https://www.csmonitor.com/1984/0515/051523.html

https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1983-11875-001

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?um=1&ie=UTF-8&lr&cites=17194868652598453761

https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-18375-MS

https://www.bcs.org/content/conWebDoc/1926#1988

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/dog-not-barking-in-bp-probe-says-former-oil-engineer

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racal

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decca_Radar

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schlumberger

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Britoil

https://www.kaggle.com/c/LANL-Earthquake-Prediction

We found another David Hawkins who’s involved with carbon credits: https://www.nrdc.org/experts/david-doniger/carb-honors-david-hawkins-nrdcs-clean-air-climate-champ

Quinn Michaels: “Burning Man Sits On Top Of A Massive Underground City”

Quinn Michaels is a LARPer playing the #tyler ARG, part of Project MAYHEM (if you don’t know what all that means, see here). By studying satellite heat maps, he claims to have discovered a massive underground city underneath The Man, possibly with a particle collider like CERN. Presumably this DUMB is staffed by secret underground agents of The Man, who are really putting the Deep in the Deep State. It is so secret that it is even more secret than Nevada’s Area 51 Dreamland, because nobody knows about it except Quinn.

Somebody should tell Quinn that Burning Man is not at exactly the same location every year, but does have the same layout every year.

2013 final web

Although Quinn Michaels claims to be an informed researcher crowdsourcing the truth, he gives no credit to my work in his video titled “Burning Man Festival Deep State Op #tyler”. I expect this sort of behavior from the #clownsource team. But there is a particle collider and underground city beneath Burning Man? Really?

Is Quinn attempting to teach his Artificial Intelligence Chatbot #tyler that Burning Man is a secret underground base? Or is this actually an attempt to discredit my extremely thoroughly documented research, in particular Part 5b – Burning With The Man, by linking Burning Man with outlandish conspiracy theories that thousands of gullible people believe without questioning?  They have tried the same thing already with their opera-tive Douglas Dietrich.

Quinn himself admits he has been working with the FBI since 2015, though it is not clear in what role. COINTELPRO? I debunked some of his ridiculous claims in this Steemit Post, Short Bus Physics With Quinn and J.Go.

Yesterday I got a post-festival Shout Out from my friend @Defango

Defango has been accused – falsely, IMO – by #clownsource as being a Star Trek weapons-wielding wizard who collapsed Quinn’s lung with a homemade microwave weapon. He seems to have become Quinn’s nemesis, along with Action Dave Acton – cstruther George Webb’s brother. Yesterday I also made an appearance on Quinn’s buddy and defender Lift The Veil’s show.  So I find it hard to believe that Quinn posting a Burning Man video today is just a coincidence. But then I’m no coincidence theorist, JV might have a different opinion.

Quinn’s psyop seems to be doing a good job of distracting his audience (13k) and the @csthetruth crowd (46k) from the Nunes Memo, and literal Nunes Garbage Train Wreck that preceded it.

nunes train wreck

Image: Visalia Times-Delta

The train had a helicopter escort with overview of the track,  as most of the Republican leadership – including Mr Nunes who as Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee has the highest level security clearance – were headed to a hotel with an underground bunker with their families. That’s how big of a deal this memo is. So much shit hitting the fan they needed to hide in a nuclear-resistant bunker.

greenbrier

greenbrier cutaway

Instead of this very real underground facility that is relevant to today’s news, Quinn is saying “look over there!” to the combined 60,000 strong alternative media crowd that have been hoodwinked by #clownsource.

Sure seems like a modus operandi to me.

In their recent episode on Antartica, Quinn pretended his insight was his alone when in fact my fellow New Zealander The Outer Light had already done two shows about it, to his much bigger audience. Quinn got the information wrong, the data generated was from the Strava app not the Fitbit device. Is he linking the “Secret C” to the 66.6% of a circle shape of Black Rock City?

Quinn and J.Go yesterday

The Outer Light 3 days ago:

The Outer Light 2 days ago:

Yesterday the Outer Light seems to have been treading on Quinn’s turf.

More coincidences?

Please follow me on YouTube and Steemit. Join me in supporting Lift The Veil, Defango, and The Outer Light on Patreon. They do original and meaningful research. Don’t give your money or Peabody Awards to the #clownsource LARPers.