Playing the victim has brought Jason Goodman this far. A channel with 85,700 subscribers that he can’t stream to. A long list of burned bridges from former guests on his show that he later betrayed. A mounting number of lawsuits across the country.
We’re facing in 2020 an exciting leap year of intense political action. Will Jason be able to cover it live? Or will his days be spent pushing paper and sweating bullets over his increasingly numerous legal entanglements?
He’s talking about the copyright strike I gave him for doxxing my family. “Leave my family out of it” is a pretty reasonable and fair request, I would hope anyone would agree with that. If he chooses to ignore it then he must accept responsibility for the consequences of his decisions.
Sadly, instead of owning up to his actions Goodman chose a childish move, striking my video in petty retaliation – even though I didn’t play anything from his channel. I was forced to upload another one with the clips he objected to edited out:
It would be easy for Mr Goodman and his recent guest Jan Irvin to do the same. Remove my copyrighted work from their video and re-upload it. Why do they choose lawsuits instead? Is their plan to tug on the heart strings of their audience to fund their pro se legal defenses with superchats? Perhaps Jason is looking longingly at the lucrative fundraising his frequent guest “Vabelle Danger” aka Robyn Gritz has been doing off her FBI wrongful dismissal claim. Her GoFundMe’s about to enter into its third year, even though the basis of her claim seems weak since she resigned in 2013 rather than being dismissed (she’s kept herself busy working at the Macy’s Cosmetics counter and as a Senior Fellow at the London Center for Policy Research).
Maybe Mr Goodman is seeing crowdsourced dollar signs after interviewing his other recent guest, the multi-million dollar king of them all, Sawman.
To remove his strike from my channel, I filed a counter-notification. Jason Goodman now has ten business days to file a new lawsuit against me, making his argument that playing modified versions of his clips from a comedy channel infringes his rights. It will be interesting to see what legal basis he comes up with, since the clips are marked parody which is specifically mentioned as acceptable Fair Use.
Outtrim v Goodman…and Irvin?
Last week Jason Goodman filed an objection to my copyright claim.
I might be a public figure, but the other person in the photograph is not. Nor is she an employee of a UN-linked agency.
Mr Goodman thinks he has the right to take peoples’ Facebook photos and display them in high definition without modification for two minutes on his channel, even if the images were privacy restricted to only be available on Facebook. Pretend to be someone’s friend so you can steal their photos, then monetize them on your stream while begging for donations and “pateon” subscriptions. He will be arguing in Court that the law somehow lets him do all of this, but I don’t think he will find much case law he can cite in support of this idea. Even if he could make a successful argument that showing a photo for minutes without specifically discussing it is somehow Fair Use, that doesn’t override the right to privacy.
YouTube’s legal process requires me to file a lawsuit against Jason Goodman to settle his dispute of my copyright claim. So I wrote to the Magistrate Judge in the most local of all his lawsuits, Sweigert v Goodman in the Southern District of New York asking permission to file a Motion to Intervene. The issues in the two cases are almost identical, because Jason Goodman doesn’t just occasionally behave like this, he has built his entire multi-national operation on a consistent and readily identifiable pattern of fake news, lies, defamation and smear campaigns – all of which I can prove with evidence that meets the Federal Standards.
Think I’m kidding? Here is evidence of an active whisper campaign he is doing right now, contacting people he sees me communicating with to smear my character. Unfortunately for him most of the people I like to associate with in the research community are actually researchers too. They have critical thinking and logic skills, and the sleight-of-mind tricks that work on Jason’s mostly boomer audience aren’t going to turn out the same way with them. You can see in this conversation how that went for him…
“He claims I was in Ukraine fomenting revolution in 2013” – I challenge Mr Goodman to provide a citation showing where I ever made that claim. The Maidan Revolution was actually in 2014. Was this a Freudian slip, revealing he was involved with AeroEscape LLC which was incorporated in 2013? You can read my coverage (evidence-backed, as always) at Insane in the Ukraine Part 3 – Sheep Dipping the Truther (also Part 1 and Part 2).
Battleground 1: Pink Umbrella Court
Here’s my letter to the Magistrate Judge in New York:
This guy has no shame – he is gaslighting the Judge. He says “Outtrim wrote a declaration in support of the Plaintiff’s motion to intervene”. This is completely false, it’s not what happened at all. Jason as the Defendant wrote an Opposition to the Motion to Intervene in which he named myself, Titus Frost and a host of others in a vast (and vastly illogical) conspiracy theory, using likes on Steemit posts to somehow stop his “truth” from coming out. Several of us who were named in Goodman’s statement wrote letters to the Judge swearing under penalty of perjury (ie. voluntarily putting ourselves in legal jeopardy if we were lying) that his claims were completely false. Mine was titled “Statement in Response to Defendant’s Opposition to Motion to Intervene”. It was not in support of any Plaintiff motions. Nor was it in support of the intervenor-applicant. It was a direct response to the unsubstantiated nonsense in Jason Goodman’s Defendant’s Statement of Opposition. The Virginia Judge refused to let Goodman bring us into his suit, ruling that we were non-parties. Goodman is trying to twist these facts into a claim that I filed a Motion to Intervene in his Virginia case which was denied by the Judge – a complete lie.
The New York Judge didn’t waste any time, issuing an Order denying Jason’s motion for a deadline extension.
This greatly upset Jason. He has a YouTube channel to run, these pesky Judges’ Orders get in the way! So he seems to have thought “maybe if I send the Judge an email with some more conspiracy theory allegations, he’ll change his mind and grant an extension so I can really ‘Close In’ with Charles Motel”
Jason Goodman emailed the Judge:
Date: November 13, 2019 at 7:53 PM Subject: Re: 1:18-cv-08653-VEC-SDA, Sweigert v. Goodman Thank you your honor, however Mr. Outtrim’s inappropriate actions have revealed new evidence that is extremely significant and must be included in my answer. Outtrim’s latest action provides further proof of the alleged conspiracy between Plaintiff and others including Outtrim.
This causes me to request that you reconsider today’s order given the following circumstances:
Irrespective of Mr. Outtrim’s denial of intervention, his reason for attempting to intervene changes my answer and requires additional time to complete. Prior to emailing you inappropriately, Mr. Outtrim submitted a fraudulent complaint to YouTube that has crippled my online business by preventing me from live streaming my daily broadcasts to my audience of 85,000 viewers. This has negatively impacted my income and is a clear example of the ongoing extrajudicial steps Plaintiff and his associates have taken in their persistent and escalating effort to disrupt my day to day life, my business and my ability to defend myself in this legal mater.
Online broadcasting is my full time job and primary source of income. The YouTube penalty will continue indefinitely IF Outtrim is able to demonstrate to Google that he has an active lawsuit against me for the same claim he has submitted to YouTube. It is extremely important to my defense that I have the additional time requested so I may adequately explain and present the relevant facts and details related to shed light on this newest development and so the court may consider these facts in rendering its decision.
I respectfully request that you reconsider the order and allow me the time extension. I stand ready to submit another motion for extention of time if that would please the court.
“Crippled” his business? He is still Premiering his videos live, which means he should be able to receive superchats and talk directly to his audience. He never interacts with the chat on his show anyway, except to delete any “trolls” who dare to question the narrative, or to post the links for his subscriptions. I haven’t gone after his Patreon or Subscribestar accounts…yet. So how is his business hurt in any way? Meanwhile my family is suffering greatly from him doxxing my wife, and I am defamed per se by him accusing me of “murdering” someone who was hit by a car in a different country, whose death was ruled suicide by vehicle.
He is also directly lying to the Judge that the YouTube copyright strike penalty is indefinite. It’s for 90 days.
His logic doesn’t add up either. He says his business is crippled while the lawsuit is going on; yet he says he wants to delay the lawsuit and stretch it out longer.
Jason’s case is jumbled and confused, and it seems that he is trying the patience of the legal system. Reconsider the Order? Who does he think he is? The judge made another Order, slapping him down again:
Jason Goodman’s response to the Second Amended Complaint was due today, November 14. He was given a choice whether to file what he was asked to three weeks ago; or file another Motion for the Judge to reconsider his denial of an extension.
Jason filed another Motion, in which he lies to the judge again and gets his own pronouns confused.
This is plainly nonsense. Why would the Plaintiffs file a motion to intervene in their own case? As I pointed out earlier, I did not write anything in support of the intervenor-applicant. Defendant Jason Goodman brought up my name and I wrote a letter to the Court categorically denying all of his claims. There was no ruling from the Judge about frivolous claims or abuse of process. In fact, the Judge spent 7 pages of a 14-page Memorandum Opinion going through the legal basis of rejecting the Motion to Intervene. There would be no need to do that for a frivolous claim, she could have just denied the Motion.
Did Jason just copy and paste his latest New York Motion? Maybe from one of Klarry Layman‘s documents? Did his close pal Laura Loomer help out? Either that or the Tinder Predator is getting rather confused about how he identifies:
He also swore under penalty of perjury that he sent a letter via email to a physical post office:
This is what happens with liars – they just can’t help themselves.
Jason asked for a week extension. The Judge finally caved on this third attempt, granting Jason an extension – but only for the weekend.
Can Mr Goodman see the rabbit hole he is digging for himself? The next stage of this case is the interrogatory discovery requests, due by next Thursday Nov 21.
Meanwhile, in Virginia
Jason Goodman recently had to appear in Court in one of the other defamation and slander lawsuits against him, Steele et al v Goodman et al in the Eastern District of Virginia.
He started out a bit confused:
The judge had to explain to the Defendant that he can’t give him legal advice:
There was a whole discussion about Goodman’s dick pics. He tried to get them taken out of the case, but it got shut down.
His claim that “I have never live-streamed a phone call with anyone without telling them” is another falsehood. I’ve personally witnessed him doing this to Laura Loomer (having an airport meltdown over her luggage), the New York Post and the Washington Post (where he used the social engineering technique of pretending to be someone else by using Kevin Marsden’s complaint ticket number). He also frequently records conversations without permission or even notification then broadcasts them, such as this one with Douglas Gabriel from American Intelligence Media.
By the end of his first day in Court, Goodman felt that anything he said would be inappropriate. The judge said that was probably true, since they were only there to set the trial date.
It’s going to be a busy 12 months of legal responses for Mr Goodman. I hear there are other lawsuits pending for him too…including two I’m aware of in California. At some point wouldn’t it be better to go back to “truth”, like the title of his channel? Surely that is preferable to trying to frame people for murders of suicide victims, shutting down ports, training people how to modify household appliances into directed energy weapons, and the rest of his LARPing antics.
It seems that all roads lead to Ukraine in the news cycle right now. We have Glenn Beck taking to the chalk board in a 2-hour special to break it down for us. The Trump impeachment story and the Ukraine story are intimately intertwined, with the Atlantic Council financing an Adam Schiff staffer’s trip to Ukraine just as the latest “whistleblower” plot to topple President Trump was being launched.
It has now come to light in the mainstream media that the sons of Joe Biden and John Kerry teamed up with the nephew of Whitey Bulger in a “shady private equity firm” to get lucrative oil and gas contracts in Ukraine and China. Nancy Pelosi’s son was there doing deals too.
Former Breitbart journalist Lee Stranahan (who is a registered foreign agent working for Russian state-sponsored propaganda outlet Sputnik) has been banging the Ukraine drum for a while now. He’s the guy who introduced his long-time friend Jason Goodman to George Webb. He now seems to be hanging out with Webb, from whom Goodman has distanced himself.
So here we have two prominent alt-media personalities, closely connected to each other, covering politics, both defendants in lawsuits, and both connected to Ukraine. We explored this in more detail in part 1 and part 2.
We have received some updated information from a source I’ll call Raven. This provided some leads for further investigation. While I have no way to confirm the identity of Raven, I believe I know who it is and find them to be a very talented researcher who collaborates with other researchers I also greatly respect. I have vetted the information they have provided as much as possible and it has all checked out, but as always, Do Your Own Research.
Jason Goodman has been enraged by the opinions I have expressed about him and his various lawsuits on this blog and my YouTube channel. He calls me a liar while lying about me; but like others in the #BlueTeam who use the same attack vector, he has yet to provide a single example of an alleged lie nor any piece of evidence to refute any claim I have made. He’s had years now. Meanwhile we always present the evidence we are using to draw conclusions. The citations are in the hyperlinks – nearly 200 in this post. Where are Jason’s citations?
Sheep Dip the Spoof
Raven believes that Jason Goodman was taken out of military intelligence and “sheep-dipped” to create an artificial career in Hollywood. Sounds preposterous? Consider the evidence we are presenting here and decide for yourself.
21st Century 3D
The first anomaly we must consider is Jason Goodman’s company “21st Century 3D”.
According to the official story, it was founded in the 20th Century. 3D film technology has been around since the 1890’s (cf The Modern Supernatural and the Beginnings of Cinema) . Like “Virtual Reality”, they keep re-launching it as “the next big thing” but it never seems to really cross the chasm into mainstream acceptance as a default technology.
Officially, 21c3d began in 1999 when the company changed its name:
In May 2001, Jason Goodman was still writing letters as President of Multimedia Software Design.
The 21st Century 3D web site was launched in July 2001, claiming it as a division of MultiMedia Software Design. If the company changed its name in 1999, why would they describe it as a division in 2001? I can find no record of the company name being changed as Jason Goodman states above.
In 2001 their web site claimed the parent company was founded in 1992:
I can’t find the name Jason Goodman anywhere in the 2001 web sites of 21st Century 3D or its parent company Multimedia Software Design. The latter’s web archive goes back to 1996 – they may have had a web site earlier, but I don’t think we had the Internet archive earlier.
From 2004 msd-nyc.com started redirecting to 21c3d.com. Jason Goodman’s name is still not there but there is a 2004 picture of him appearing to operate a camera.
The first mention of his name I can find on the Web site of 21st Century 3D was in February 2006. He is not described as CEO or President.
Jason Goodman is mentioned on the Multimedia Software Design website in November 1998 in relation to a column he wrote in Keyframe magazine. Once again, he is not described as CEO or President.
What’s the Problem?
The problem is that this “Jason Goodman” character – who supposedly has a 25 year+ long career in Hollywood – has basically nothing on the Internet documenting his activities in the movie industry until the late Noughties. There seems to be a 16 year gap.
His LinkedIn page tells two conflicting stories. He claims that 21st Century 3D was started in July 1993. Yet he didn’t graduate from NYU Film School until 1994. Why was he saying 1992 for Multimedia Software Design in 2001? In 1992 Jason Goodman was 19 years old and in the 3rd year of a 5-year college degree in Film. Why was he saying 1999 for 21st Century 3D in 2011? Real resumés don’t change years and company names over time.
Raven has searched but has not been able to verify that this Jason Goodman really graduated with a degree from NYU. It might seem at first glance that he was there for 4 years, but this is actually 5 years of college (my own 3 year degree was 1990-92). Jason Goodman was 17 in 1990.
The Wayback machine does not have Jason’s LinkedIn page archived, but my one is saved in 2008 and 2009. This suggests that his page was created later than 2009, and LinkedIn profiles no longer get crawled by the Wayback machine.
The New York State Department’s Corporations Division tells another story again. They have no listing for “MultiMedia Software Design” (nor could I find one in California). However there is one of “MultiMedia System Design”. This company was registered on the summer solstice, June 21 1994.
When Jason Goodman registered the trademark for “Crowdsource the Truth”, claiming its first commercial use was October 1 2016, he did so in the name of Multimedia System Design Inc.
I could find no trademark for 21st Century 3d, 21c3d, MultiMedia Software Design, or MultiMedia System Design.
The US Patent and Trademark Office does have three registered trademark entries for Multimedia Systems Design Inc. Their mark was filed on June24, 1998 by Miller Freeman Inc, a publishing company in San Francisco founded in 1902. The trademark was issued in 2000. They would not have been able to get this if there was another company with such a similar name already doing business in the multimedia field.
Once again, the evidence does not match the story. If the story is legit, it should be easy for Mr Goodman to demonstrate this by showing incorporation documents, pointing us to his trademark or certificates of stock ownership, perhaps showing us bank statements or invoices.
Jason Goodman has called me a liar without identifying and refuting with evidence even a single alleged “lie”.
I have just demonstrated with evidence that Jason Goodman is lying on his LinkedIn page about his company history and name. There was no 21st Century 3d in 1993; as a legal entity, there still doesn’t appear to be one today. Even 20 years ago, his company was lying about both its history and its name. The difference between 1992 and 1994 might not seem significant but in the world of multimedia and the web it is the difference between being a pioneer and a latecomer.
What Happened 1994-2009?
The 21c3D YouTube channel was started in July 2009. Interestingly, the location is listed as the U.K.
One would think that a video production company that had been doing business for 15-17 years by the time they launched their YouTube channel would have a bunch of epic stuff they had done for their clients to post. There’s not a single video that I can associate with a date prior to 2009.
Here’s their 2013 demo reel:
Why does a Multimedia Software Design company have a “clinical research manager”?
A TruthFinder background report on Jason Goodman reveals some more interesting connections – companies that are not listed in his LinkedIn profile.
I can’t find anything online for LEVY:ARIE Media Brokers.
I did find a “Goodman Media Group” (no longer in business) out of New York with Jason Goodman as President, publishing UFO magazines:
Last year the company, now called Recall Productions, paid $200 million to acquire an Artificial Intelligence business. Jason Goodman does not appear to be on the Board these days.
Carolco’s Lebanese founder Mario Kassar selected Goodman for his “oeuvre as substantial as some of the other great cinematographers”:
So where is this “substantial oeuvre”? Surely even one clip from it would be in his show reel? Or was Mr Kassar talking about the bikini car wash in 3D?
Seen Holding Statues
A “three-time Lumiere Award winning Innovator”, that sounds impressive. Innovator is even capitalized! Unfortunately for Mr Goodman (and other Officers of this publicly traded company potentially submitting false information to the SEC) this has been completely debunked by The Hudson Report in Jason Goodman: From Russia With Love
Since publishing this story: all of the pictures of Goodman with the Lumiere Awards statues have been ‘scrubbed’ from images in a Google search. Is someone on the Google team providing support for Goodman’s cover? The only picture with Jason Goodman holding the statues… now links to his IMDB page which has a description.
The funny thing about this description, is that it didn’t exist before this story was published. Once again, Goodman tries to change history using false information to support the ongoing ‘cover’ that he has developed and promoted for years. The International 3D Society’s 4th Annual 3D Creative Arts Awards Ceremony of 2013NEVER presented Goodman with any awards. He did not win anything. How do we know? Here’s the documentation…Four different articles that provide the list of winners for the 2013 The International 3D Society’s 4th Annual 3D Creative Arts Awards Ceremony.
Goodman is not on any of the lists. He did not win any awards.
Goodman’s Lumiere Awards picture is designed to mislead the public. The evidence speaks for itself…
This pattern of claiming credits for awards not received was repeated when Jason and his sidekick Charles Ortel made a big deal about “getting nominated for a Peabody Award” – which anyone can nominate somebody for. See CryptoBeast #2 – #Clownsource the #Peabody
Where Are The Credits?
The movie industry is not like software. If I start a company and take it public in an IPO, there might be some names of CxOs or other Key Personnel mentioned in documents, but you’re not going to read the names of the receptionist or development team. Hollywood is the opposite. Watch a movie all the way to the end and you will see “credits”. Everyone who worked on that movie is listed, “junior assistant to key grip” and so on.
Jason Goodman does show up in movie credits…but not until much later in his alleged career.
The movie industry has IMDB, the Internet Movie Database. You can go to it and search peoples’ names and see what movies they were in.
…who played “boy head” in a creepy pedo-ish video which begins with a teen male awaking with an erection, moves to close ups of him zipping his fly, then shows him covered in blood at a “killer” party surrounded by adults with their skin being cut revealing them as reptilians. Just some of the “other” Hollywood Jason Goodmans. Note the icon on this one’s web site:
Wire-rimmed glasses. A slight build that can’t fill up his uniform. The name is the same and they look very similar. The article describes Sergeant Goodman as “a guy who likes to slip into the background”.
In Part 1 I showed a video of Jason presenting in London in March 2014 as CEO of AeroCine, whose principals had just flown a drone equipped with high definition surveillance capabilities over Ukraine’s Chernobyl nuclear site in February 2014, the time of the Maidan Revolution there. I observed that he had a completely different demeanor and posture to today’s character – a military bearing as he moved about the stage.
Both have quite pronounced grooves running from their nose below their cheekbones, and a slight upwards curve to their lips like The Joker. Both have a dimple between the lower lip and the chin. The straightness of the nose and roundness of the tip, the flare of the nostrils, the size of these in relation to each other and the face…to me all look very similar.
What do you think, readers? Same guy, or different? Please leave your thoughts in the comments.
Hollywood Crowdsources the Revolution
Hollywood was deeply involved in the Ukraine revolution.
This revolution was not random, but part of a larger geopolitical strategy.
If you watched my CryptoBeast #22 and #15 interviews with Carl Hassell, or #11 with Joe Atwill, then it might not surprise you to learn that the neo-Nazis behind the Ukrainian revolution were funded by Jewish billionaire oligarchs:
Lest I be accused of anti-Semitism, please note that this is quoting a story from the Times of Israel about a secret report given to Benjamin Netanyahu:
The hands of the Obama Administration’s State Department were all over this coup (note Victoria Nuland is married to Robert Kagan, one of the leaders of the Neocon-Zionist cabal):
Ukraine’s revolution was propelled by “the Blue Helmets of Maidan”, a probable (and ironic) reference to the United Nations Peacekeeping Force.
According to Commander Delta, one of the key militias organizing the revolt was an irregular unit of 5 IDF soldiers leading 35 “non-Jewish” men and women, confirmed by Chief Rabbi Moshe Azman of Odessa’s Brodsky Synagogue (Chabad Lubovitch):
Commander “Delta” came out of a Reconnaissance battalion of the IDF – as in, drones.
In what seems like an unusual amount of work for a newspaper story, the New York Times shared a 3D model reconstruction and sophisticated multimedia presentation of the Maidan massacre sniper positions.
“The problem was how to take multiple vantage points and put them together into a coherent analysis,” he said. “Maidan was the same problem set, but on steroids.”
The quantity of raw footage amassed by Nefertari was overwhelming, running into the thousands of hours
When the Maidan Revolution broke out in Ukraine, 21st Century 3D sent out a couple of cryptic tweets with the words Start and Reset, which were both commented on by Jeff Brink in an unusual manner. One was in Cromwell, CT; the next was from Seacaucus, NJ (code relating to “Caucasus”, perhaps?):
Was this steganography? Or was he talking about his self-proclaimed record for the longest drone flight with a Red camera?
Videos and tweets are a good way to engineer an alibi. We have no way of telling if the upload dates were the same as the filming dates, or if it was Jason himself tweeting to the @21c3d account. The combined metadata creates the impression that he was not in Ukraine at the time. His team was, I will show proof of that in the timeline below.
The social media timelines of the principals shows how the operation unfolded, starting with a trip to Sweden for a “Black Armored Drone”:
There are 8 people pictured. Who was funding all this?
Who did they know? Surely it would take months of planning and paperwork to get a permit for something like this involving a sensitive nuclear site? This suggests they had someone powerful behind the scenes that was making this stuff happen for them.
Note the (very expensive) RED camera and ARRI equipment being fitted to the Black Armored Drone:
By February 8 2014, the Forward Operations Group was in place in Chernobyl, Ukraine, about 60 miles from Kiev:
Kevin Marsden got confirmation directly from the pilot that the Aerocine crew were there in Ukraine when the revolution was happening – not just for their Chernobyl filming:
Three days before the main event of the Ukraine revolution (assuming again that publish date is the same as filming date), Jason Goodman demonstrated that the AeroEscape heavy lift drone could have 3D capability with 2 RED EPIC cameras. Recognize that Chelsea rooftop?
The comments to the video from the New York City Drone Film Festival confirm that the footage was shot in February 2014 as a showcase of AeroCine. AeroEscape was the name of the project, after the successful Ukraine mission AeroCine became the company name.
What did Jason Goodman do from September 2014 until May 2017, when he appeared on the YouTube truther scene with George Webb?
What We Can Prove
The timeline above provides evidence that
Jason Goodman, Brian Streem and Jeff Brink, principals of AeroCine, were working together on drone projects in February 2014;
they were specifically working together on Feb 20, 2014, the day of the Maidan Square sniper massacre in Kiev;
key members of their team including the chief pilot were in Ukraine from at least Feb 8, 2014 through the revolution.
In Part 1 we posted proof that Jason Goodman, Brian Streem and Jeff Brink formed Aerocine together, that Jason Goodman was CEO, and the company claimed credit for flying its technology over Ukraine.
In Part 2 we posted a list of responses to Part 1 from Jason Goodman. We have now addressed each one of these with evidence. Where is Mr Goodman’s evidence?
“it started before I got involved” We have proved that Jason Goodman was involved with AeroCine in February 2014. He was the first one tweeting out about “Guinness”, being retweeted by co-founder Jeff Brink. Their Crunchbase profile specifically mentions the Feb 21 flight was conducted by AeroCine.
“the original aircraft was purchased in Sweden” No dispute, we showed their trip to obtain the Black Armored Drone. Who financed this expensive drone, camera, and travel?
“the two original owners of that company actually decided to go to Ukraine and do a video over the Chernobyl nuclear reactor” We have shown from their social media reactions that it is more likely that they were given this assignment than that they decided to seek it out. “Holy crap. Things just got real” and “It’s all about who you know”, said Brink.
“this is before I got involved in the company” The same as point 1. We have shown Jason Goodman, Jeff Brink and Brian Streem were all involved together flying drones in February 2014, which is when the Chernobyl flight took place. We also showed Jason’s presentation in March 2014 as CEO of AeroCine where he showed the footage that “just went viral all around the world” (which has been edited out) – this was either the footage of Chernobyl, which it appears to be from how he is describing it to the audience; or if not then it was the footage of the ARRI “Guinness” flight. Tweets and video prove Jason Goodman was present at the latter, and Brink’s tweets about #AeroEscape prove they were working together.
“they got in a dispute with the Swedish manufacturer and the helicopter failed” We have no evidence that the helicopter failed in Ukraine. Instead, a documentary of the footage won multiple awards, suggesting the mission was a success. We have shown the helicopter being assembled brand new, specifically for the Chernobyl mission. We also provided video of the successful test flight of the drone upon delivery in Sweden.
“when I joined that company they had no working helicopter, I had to go to Sweden and re-establish the relationship with the manufacturer to get that helicopter repaired and back in the sky” The helicopter appears to have been working fine on Feb 8 2017 and they also had a working helicopter able to set “Guinness” records on Feb 20 and 21 2017. So at what point did they not have a working helicopter? Did the drone get damaged in Ukraine after the Chernobyl filming? Who provided the financing for Goodman’s trip to Sweden? Streem’s Aerobo raised $2 million but it was founded in October 2015, more than a year after Goodman’s departure.
“then I got them to change the name of their company to Aerocine” They registered the company as AeroEscape LLC on December 18, 2013; after the Chernobyl mission they filed on March 12 2014 to change the name to AeroCine. Jason Goodman was tweeting with Jeff Brink about #AeroEscape on February 20-21, 2014. It’s all the same thing.
Trademark Turf War
On September 17, 2014 at 10:29pm, Jason Goodman was kicked out of AeroCine (LLC). You can see from this tweet that AeroCine and AeroEscape were interchangeable.
AeroCine, INC was registered as a Delaware corporation 9/11/2014, but was never registered in New York.
Goodman claimed commercial use of the AeroCine trademark since March 13, 2014.
I can find no registration for AeroCine, INC in the New York State Department Companies Register. Only AeroCine LLC, registered by Brian Streem in December 2013.
Jason Goodman claims he has used the AeroCine word mark since March 13, 2014; but the Name History above proves Brian Streem was using it commercially a day before that. The trademark was eventually granted to Jason Goodman, after what looks like some battle.
On April 21 2015 Brian Streem registered AeroCine Ventures INC. He correctly registered the company in Delaware then registered in New York as a foreign corporation.
AeroCine Ventures, INC was registered before Jason Goodman’s trademark was granted in November 2015. They appear to still be doing business under that name, with 34 different drone aircraft tail numbers registered with the FAA since 2015. Hoovers estimates their annual revenues at $1.5 million, so the drone business seems a lot more lucrative than the crowdsourcing truth business. AeroCine Ventures owns the Aerobo and Vermeer trademarks.
A 2016 SEC filing gives further insight into the financials of AeroCine Ventures:
We presume that this is the same corporation as Brian Streem’s Aerobo.
Why is Jason Goodman allowing others to make millions off his trademark?
Jason Goodman has two mentors of significance to this story: John Rupkalvis and Jerome Corsi. Both are connected to Minnesota.
Goodman’s Mentor John Rupkalvis graduated from the University of Minnesota and did some of his first major projects there. He has worked for NASA, JPL, Grumman Aerospace, Stanford University, and Bell Research. He worked on the Viking Mars Lander and developed Virtual Reality technology for the US Army. He’s the first person I’ve ever come across with an 80-page resumé:
Here are the two of them in 2005, one of the oldest photos of Jason Goodman to be found on the Internet. Does he really look like a guy who’s been CEO of a Hollywood multimedia production company for 13 years?
They met up again in 2006:
By 2008 Jason was sharing offices with John Rupkalvis and Pedro Guimaraes.
Rupkalvis, Jason Goodman, Ivan Stamatovski and Pedro Guimaraes worked together on a number of projects.
How does a guy like Jason Goodman find himself with someone like John Rupkalvis – with not just a Deep State, but even a Deep Space background – as his mentor?
Raven contends that Rupkavlis set Goodman up with a team to do the work and let him take the credit, in order to create a cover story:
Why was John Rupkalvis, technical genius, assigned to Jason Goodman? We have no idea. Nothing qualifies Goodman for this level of attention or training… The year 2010 seems to be the ‘break out’ year for Goodman to present himself as a viable Hollywood ‘player.’ He had a few years of training, his 21st Century 3D company had been managed by other people i.e. Serbians and now it was time for him to move into his new role. Here’s the promotional video that launches his new cover. Jeff Pierce makes an introductory appearance along with John Rupklavis and Jason Goodman…the ‘star’ of the video. In the future, Jeff Pierce plays a role in Goodman’s drone business Aerocine.
It’s clear that Ivan & Baker were running 21st Century 3D…Milena was supporting their work. Goodman was learning about cameras via Ivan, Rupkalvis, Pedro and at camera shows as part of his training as a sales person/intel insert…
It appears that Pedro Guimaraes’s role was to promote Goodman as a stereoscopic designer. It’s possible that he was ‘Panama Mike’ from Crowd Source the Truth . If you watch any of the online videos prior to 2016, it is clear that Goodman does not operate the equipment. There are staged photos that have the appearance of Goodman working on something , however, it is our opinion that Goodman is ‘front’ guy for whatever operation he represents. He has never been an inventor…Rupkalvis is the real ‘wizard behind the curtain.’
I did find one patent application related to Stereoscopic technology registered with Jason David Goodman and James Vincent Masi, but it was abandoned. I found three patents for John Rupkalvis.
Raven offers this Steadi3d article as proof that Jason Goodman wasn’t allowed to actually operate the cameras, Pedro did all that.
He claims to have “above Mossad” intelligence sources:
Dr Corsi has appeared on Crowdsource the Truth many times, frequently with his attorney Larry Klayman who sued Obama, Hillary Clinton and his own Mother. He was part of the infamous Clear and Present Danger show which shut down the 8th busiest port in the U.S. with a plotline apparently based on a 2005 book Corsi wrote about Dirty Bombs.
According to George Webb, Dr Corsi offered he and Jason $9000 each per month. Shortly after that the Port of Charleston Dirty Bomb Hoax, Who Spoofed the Seth Rich Files, QAnon and other LARPs were launched – the latest Part 3 of my series on LARPwars has more details.
Jerome Corsi was linked to Minnesota when he was raising the “Israel Opportunities Fund”, an Israeli-focused mutual fund for B’nai B’rith (Jewish Freemasonry) designed to bring US dollars to enrich Israel by “developing business”.
This turned into a scandal in Poland involving one of the Rockefellers. B’Nai B’rith was banned in Poland for being “of Masonic character”.
Let’s start with Ivan Stamtovski their social media guy. He left the company in July 2011 after 7 years.
On Feb 11, 2014, as the AeroCine team were in Ukraine and revolution was breaking out, somehow Ivan also decided to start a drone company, Easy Aerial.
They launched on May 13, 2014 with a Kickstarter with a $20,000 goal. They raised $45,627. Their next Kickstarter raised $38,500.
Then they raised a seed round of $1.6 million.
Now clients include the US Air Force and Navy, as well as Israel, Thailand, Japan and “Europe and Central Africa”.
EasyAerial seem to have a mostly Serbian team. Somehow they managed to get 5 senior Israeli Air Force officers on their advisory board.
Some more 21st Century 3D Serbians:
3D animator and production assistant Milena Lekovic went to Baruch College, same as Ivan Stamatovski:
Here she is at the “Guinness” flight in February 2014. This is significant because according to her LinkedIn she was not working for 21st Century 3D at that time.
Jeff Pierce was also at this flight. He’s the guy in the trenchcoat standing next to Jason Goodman.
Jeff Pierce ran John Rupkalvis’ company at the time Jason Goodman was getting his Hollywood experience.
Pierce’s current job involves cryptographic technology developed by the Defense Department.
Stephen Baker may not be Serbian, but in Raven’s opinion he was the real person running 21st Century 3D. Like Goodman, Streem, and Brink, Baker also graduated from NYU.
The 21st Century 3D LinkedIn group has 328 members. Why did Jason walk away from his long and “award-winning” career? For drones and LARPs?
Jason Goodman claims that I am a liar who just “makes up nonsense”. I believe that over three posts here we have demonstrated the quality of our research and evidence. Mr Goodman is yet to produce any evidence, and his own claims contradict the facts.
With all these Serbians involved with him, I find it #HighlySuspicious that Jason Goodman recently teamed up with Jan Irvin to smear me. Jan Irvin lived in Serbia around the time of the 90’s war, was married to a Serbian, and was registered as an agent and business contact for the American Serbian Association for Peace. See Debunking Jan Irvin – Part 2 for details. Both Jason Goodman and Jan Irvin have been on InfoWars, which is considered by most truthers to be a Zionist-friendly operation.
Jason is on video speaking fluent Russian. He sure has a penchant for associating himself with foreign agents. He has more guests with Deep State backgrounds on his show than any other YouTube Truther – by a country mile. More than Alex Jones, even. He’s also quick to whip out the Anti-Semitism card against his critics.
If everything we have presented is 100% true, not even a minor detail mis-stated, would Jason Goodman’s response then be to say “OK Steve, you got me, good job done. I admit I’m a Lifetime Actor, I lied to my audience to get money from them”? Or would he call me a liar, dismiss it as nonsense, play the victim of trolls and gangstalkers, and attack me with ad hominems, sophistry and doxxing?
Mr Goodman says that I am a coward because I criticize him in New Zealand where I can’t be sued. In fact New Zealand has a very robust legal system, as he should know from his relationship with Kim Dotcom who has been battling in the Courts here for the better part of a decade. The full might of the US Department of Justice hasn’t been able to railroad him out of here yet. Jason Goodman has been to New Zealand recently himself, coming along with Hillary Clinton on her last visit and miraculously being allowed to film and livestream her entire (sold out) $300 a ticket event.
New Zealand is ranked #2 in Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index. The United States is #22, meaning the U.S. is much more corrupt. New Zealand is #5 in the Index of Public Integrity, compared to #12 for the United States. Mr Goodman is more likely to get a fair trial in New Zealand than in the United States.
If I am wrong about something, I invite him to show the evidence and I would be happy to print a correction, even apologize if necessary. Can Mr Goodman say the same? His slander of me is easy to identify, but where is mine against him?
All I am doing here is showing evidence. Please consider it and draw your own conclusions, to me it seems obvious.