This story from the Seattle Times / Associated Press discusses the fact that no-one seems to have come out and complained about the new Environmental Assessment.
It seems an increase to 70,000 participants or more could still be on the cards.
with a week to go for public comment on it, organizers’ request to boost the event’s maximum allowable crowd size by 20 percent to 70,000 is attracting only scant opposition – and none from the environmental organization.
Veteran Sierra Club activist Tina Nappe of Reno attributes the reversal of the position to Burning Man organizers’ track record of cleaning up and addressing environmental concerns at the largest outdoor arts festival in North America.
Black Rock LLC, which runs the weeklong celebration of radical self-expression and self-reliance leading up to Labor Day, recognizes the desert environment has limitations and strives to minimize environmental impacts, she said.
The federal Bureau of Land Management oversees the eclectic art and music gathering because it’s staged on public land in the scenic, sprawling Black Rock Desert, about 100 miles north of Reno.
“BRLLC, because of running the gauntlet of BLM regulations and addressing local concerns, has become a model citizen,” Nappe wrote by email. “BLM’s `leave no trace’ program has received a real boost by Burning Man.”
Cory Roegner, of the BLM’s Black Rock Field Office, said no group has come out so far against organizers’ proposed five-year license that would increase the crowd cap from 58,000 to 70,000 over the next five years.
Fewer individuals than past years have lodged complaints, he said, and the reason for the dampened opposition is twofold.
“Organizers have been doing a great job of cleaning up and leaving no trace,” Roegner said. “I think they’re also providing a lot of economic benefits to northern Nevada, which I think members of the public are responding to.”
The festival pumps millions into the economy of a state that leads the nation in foreclosures and unemployment. Burning Man participants spend an estimated $10 million around Reno, and Reno-Tahoe International Airport receives about 15,000 people from more than 30 countries for the gathering.
Organizers’ request to increase the capacity comes after the festival sold out for the first time last year with a crowd in excess of 53,000. The sell-out forced organizers to sell the bulk of this year’s tickets through random drawings, but demand exceeded supply thanks in part to scalpers, leaving many regulars out in the cold.
Burning Man spokeswoman Marian Goodell said organizers have shown they can handle the larger crowd, and have gone out of their way to be “good citizens.”
“There’s a lot of different things that irritate people about Burning Man, but when we hear of issues we put every effort to resolve them,” she told The Associated Press. “As the event has grown, we have prided ourselves on listening to neighbors, and I think that’s why you haven’t heard any major complaints to the latest request.”
Goodell said she thinks the desert venue could accommodate a Burning Man crowd of 100,000 or more.
Pingback: HuffPo vs NYT – Mainstream Media Battles Over Burners | Burners.Me: Me, Burners and The Man
Pingback: How To Save the World | Burners.Me: Me, Burners and The Man
Pingback: OMG Now Lottery? More Vehicle Passes | Burners.Me: Me, Burners and The Man
Pingback: Vehicle Pass FAQ Up | Burners.Me: Me, Burners and The Man
Pingback: The Dark Side of Burning Man: Rape on the Playa – SF Weekly | Burners.Me Burning Man commentary blog
Pingback: From “Sold Out” to “Shrinking”: Burning Man attendance down on last year | Burners.Me Burning Man commentary blog
Pingback: See You On The Flip Side…? | Burners.Me Burning Man commentary blog
Pingback: Condition Alpha: Can you handle the Blow? | Burners.Me Burning Man commentary blog
Pingback: Let’s get a Burner on the inside! BLM hiring new ranger for Gehrlach | Burners.Me Burning Man commentary blog
Pingback: SF Examiner: “BLM Citation was issued in October” | Burners.Me Burning Man commentary blog
Pingback: “Not just a party in the desert”: Burning Man makes its case on Capitol Hill | Burners.Me Burning Man commentary blog
Pingback: False Accusations? Bobzilla questions Burners.Me, “where’s the evidence?” | Burners.Me Burning Man commentary blog
Pingback: Nevada’s #1 Newspaper: “Plans for 70,000 at Burning Man draw little opposition” | Burners.Me Burning Man commentary blog
Pingback: BMOrg: “we like slow growth, the permit allows 70,000 but we don’t want that until 2016″ | Burners.Me Burning Man commentary blog
Pingback: Burning Man Designated Zombie Safe Zone? « CONSUMPTION BLOG
Like Coachella they should move to a two week Burn – 50,000 one week, 50,000 the next.