#LARPWars Part 10 – Foxes are Cunning and Duplicitous

DISCUSSION OF INFORMATION IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST

Previous Coverage:

#LARPWars Part 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

You may remember the Well Traveled Fox, who initially denied being the financier of the ShadowBox operation but later launched a lawsuit against the other members of ShadowBox seeking the return of money she provided to them while they were working together.

A recent counter-claim filed against her by Trevor Fitzgibbon sheds interesting light on the character of this person.

bogaerts-v-fitzgibbon

Fox has accused me of faking emails, a claim I vehemently deny. So it is ironic that she is now accused of doing that herself, imagining an email attributed to Trevor which he denies sending:

This is the paragraph referenced:

In writing about this character, it is hard not to notice a trail of broken hearts…

The accusation in a nutshell: Fox knew Trevor was financially ruined by Radack’s false prosecution. She sent Trevor money, said she wanted to help and did not want to be repaid. He hired her in December 2017 as a paralegal for his case against Radack. In March 2018 she delivered private information from his case to the opposing party via a black hat hacker, then demanded repayment of the money as it was a loan.

Trevor was investigated criminally for more than a year, and was not charged. He also won in Court against Radack. Text messages from her after the event sure made it seem consensual.

Source: ShadowProof

He then had to sue her again for violating the terms of their settlement agreement.

The Judge found Radack, herself an attorney, in Contempt of Court. He slammed her in a harsh ruling that said he had even considered incarceration for her conduct.

Source: Radsoft News

This Order was made 26 April 2019.

In Trevor’s Counter-claim against Fox, new information is revealed about her involvement in these matters:

A double agent.

Looks to me like they were out to get this guy, and this lady was a part of it. She was not acting alone.

Here Ray Johansen appears to be confessing to illegal hacking and insider knowledge of CIA cyber operations. If he truly had the FBI hunting him for 20 years as the mastermind target of Operation BUCCANEER, why would he just so casually reveal it in an email? He thinks it’s secure because it’s Proton Mail?

This guy was initially friendly towards me:

Then he came out against me, accusing my personal Twitter account @steveouttrim and the one for this blog @burnersdotme of being Thomas Schoenberger sock puppet accounts. It seemed weird and out of the blue, but now makes more sense. It suits Fox for her White Knights Lestat and Ray to spread her anti-Schoenberger propaganda like dozens of accounts are TS – even when real people behind the accounts come forward themselves or get doxed, they persist with these fake narratives.

To me this looks like some sort of operation. Cicada 3301 is a target, WikiLeaks is a target, QAnon is a target. Anonymous may also be a target. We can see some of the operators, the LARPers out there in social media doing the work. It’s harder to make out the string pullers, the Shadow Brokers behind the scenes weaving all these players together and casting them forth with missions and objectives.

Ray had been in communications with Fox for many months when he first approached me, only to turn on me a month later. All part of framing a narrative?


“A woman that had seen what he was planning reached out to me”. I’m no lawyer, but this does seem to fit the definition of a conspiracy.

Things didn’t go so well for Ray with his girlfriend Bailey, once she worked out he was two-timing her with Fox. Another broken heart.

Ray’s OpSec seems pretty poor, publicly bragging about his hacking operations and giving his team instructions in the open on Twitter. It appears attorney Steven Biss was a target of this group as well as his client Trevor Fitzgibbon. Ray is specifically tagging Mexico, Italy, and Sweden, suggesting he has assets in his hacking team in these locations. Lestat is in Mexico, Fox sent Thomas Schoenberger down there to stay with him.

The “third party” interview was with Defango, who has since lost his YouTube channel and “Danger Zone Live” sock puppet account. In the interview Defango also claimed to have been involved in Operation Buccaneer piracy, and knew people from his crew who were now in jail. Not him…of course. Why can certain people openly brag about crimes and never get in trouble for it?

Strange bedfellows.


The Lure of a Fox

PaxNomad aka Well Traveled Fox has been accused of mind-controlling recruiting men on the Internet to “White Knight” for her operations.

Thomas Schoenberger claims to be a victim of this “honey potting” and points out that her husband works for Schlumberger, a company with a long history of intelligence ties (denied by the CIA). Curiously, Abel Danger co-founder and Jason Goodman sidekick David Hawkins also worked for Schlumberger for many decades before leaving to work for a UK Defence contractor, and claims to have employed Marvin Minsky, Jeffrey Epstein‘s protege.

More recent public champions include Lestat and dubious Norwegian character Ray Johansen (the tortured by Hells Angels one, not the Mayor of Oslo one).

These “white knights” appear to be weaponized against the targets of Fox, who is allegedly a millionaire.

Lestat has accused Defango of trying to infiltrate WikiLeaks via Unity4J

Since 2017 Defango has been well funded by The Tanya, wife of attorney Steven Biss. “The Tanya” happens to be the name of the main book of Chabad, a sect based on Jewish mysticism.

In 2017 Fox was part of “US News Corp” with “Trish the Dish”, early co-host of Crowdsource the Truth when Jason Goodman & George Webb did their “Dirty Bomb – Maersk Memphis” LARP – which turned out to be fueled by an FBI provocateur “Rock Hudson”. Trish and Jason went to the UK and interviewed Craig Murray outside the Ecuadorian Embassy with Julian Assange inside. The “cover story” for the trip was George’s “Where is Eric Braverman” LARP.

Fox seems very, very interested in this world of WikiLeaks.

Trevor Fitzgibbon is connected to Julian Assange directly, as well as Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden. The other person connected to all three is John Perry Barlow, but Trevor told me he did not know him.

Fitzgibbon was one of the very first guests on Crowdsource the Truth when George and Jason teamed up – so new that George didn’t even get the name of their show right in the interview.

George Webb claims to have known Julian Assange since he was 14, and passed thumb drives to Michael Ratner. Ratner is dead but his sister Ellen has been deeply involved in this plot too, as one of the claimed sources of Ed Butowsky (see #LARPWars Part 3 – Shadowbox).

Butowksy has not been doing very well lately in his various lawsuits and has withdrawn from many of them.

FOX News has just settled with Seth Rich’s family for a 7-figure sum.


Coincidence Theory

I’ve been unpacking this LARPWars story for a few years now. 2016 brought us DNC and Podesta leaks, #SethRich and #Pizzagate; in 2017, the Las Vegas massacre and #QAnon; in 2018-19, #IsaacKappy.

It’s remarkable how so many massive stories with huge international geopolitical implications relate back to a small cluster of characters, who keep appearing across what are ostensibly unconnected narrative streams.

Q has posted about “coincidence” 264 times, 5.33% of posts.

I do believe that coincidences exist, and sometimes are nothing more than that. However there is a threshold, a Coefficient of Coincidence. Q has alluded to this too, 5 mentions was enough to make “How many coincidences before mathematically impossible?” a catchphrase of the movement:

For each person the Coefficient seems to vary, for me after 3 coincidences I become quite suspicious and once it gets into double-digits I’m convinced.

A lot of the coincidences in this LARPwars story seem to cluster around WikiLeaks/Seth Rich.


Wiki Infiltraitors

Lestat has repeatedly attacked Unity4J Founder Suzy Dawson. Like Edward Snowden, Suzy has relocated to Russia as a political cyber-exile. You can read the story of her harassment here.

When the world was against Trevor, Suzy and Elizabeth Lea Vos of Disobedient Media were among the few who publicly stood up for him. Both have been attacked by Lestat.

In #LARPWars Part 5 we showed evidence that Defango asked Lestat for help in gathering a paid troll army.

Lestat denies that he actually did this in response to Defango’s request. He continued to work with Defango for months afterwards before their inevitable “falling out”, which seems to happen with remarkable frequency between these characters (Lestat is @Atfoyovsky, Defango this month is @propernes):


Shadow Box, Silent Partner

One could call December 2017 “the height of ShadowBox” – the “Jason Goodman/Arnon Milchan CIA Source Bacon Confirmed” LARP was being launched by Defango, with a failed attempt to “launder” the disinfo through Dave Acton.

Defango and Thomas Schoenberger had not yet holed up in a hotel suite working on their master plan. Fox had not yet sent TS a mushy Valentine’s Day card:

Here’s what Fox had to say about Trevor later on:

“Defango and Trevor decided to go behind our back and start their own company, Silent Partner, without telling us. And when that happened it killed the company…Trevor got $11,000.”

The Silent Partner Steemit account was created December 7 2017, and was immediately endorsed by Defango and Frank Bacon.

If we are to believe what she told Lift The Veil, then when she said Trevor was “going behind our back” starting a company with Defango (our meaning herself and Thomas Schoenberger), in fact he was hiring her to be his paralegal assistant.

Trevor Fitzgibbon denies ever starting a company with Defango. He said they spoke one night about joining forces to do PR for crypto clients but never had a customer or did anything official.

Silent Partner is the name of Trevor’s company, which according to LinkedIn he founded in January 2015. The domain history for the silentpartner.io domain name somewhat supports this, although there is nothing at the site or in the Internet archive. I can’t find any records of this company on the Internet.

Source: LinkedIn

In a May 2017 PR Week interview Trevor said his company was called Mission Critical Media. He told me “I started Silent Partner in 2016 after I was taken down”.

He said he is currently working with an independent group looking to investigate and expose voter fraud in the 2020 election. This seems ironic given MAGACo infiltraitor Defango first met Trevor in 2008 when they were both working on the Obama campaign.

Source: LinkedIn

Trevor seems to have had a falling out with David Brock of Media Matters. It was then that the Machine seemed to turn on him. Backlash for #Pizzagate and the Podesta leaks?

In June this year Trevor published on Medium a statement back-dated to January 25, 2020 (before Fox’s lawsuit was filed on March 16):

Source: Medium

The attorney he is referring to is Steven Biss, married to “the” Tanya Biss – see LARPWars Part 8


The #MeToo Attack Vector

It is interesting that they went after Trevor, Julian Assange, and WikiLeaks’ Jacob Appelbaum with the by-now-familiar “#MeToo” attack vector.

Suzy Dawson has exposed a few instances of this.

Defango has claimed a few times to know Jacob Appelbaum. He has also accused people of being a rapist, without evidence.

Knowing that this attack vector is part of a playbook helps to understand why it is seen so frequently on social media:


The Pedo Attack Vector

There was also a failed attempt to cast Julian Assange as a pedophile that was traced by Anons back to a San Francisco Bay Area tech company connected to the Clintons and Epstein pal Larry Summers, and connected to Noam Chomsky.

Few people today understand that exposing the global pedo cult was one of the first things addressed by WikiLeaks – and by Q.

Watch Titus Frost’s excellent new documentary about The Syndicate. Why do people come out so hard to attack him personally – but can’t address any of the evidence presented?

Who are the truth-tellers? Who are the gatekeepers? Who are the spellcasters? Who is really on the side of good, and who is LARPing as a white knight? By their fruits shall ye know them.

We report. You decide. #LARPWars

SDNY Judge Supports Burners.Me – Jason Goodman LOLSuit Thrown Out of Court

Some good news in the Southern District of New York. The judge has thrown out Jason Goodman’s Counter-Claim in the Dave Acton lawsuit, in which supposedly I was named as a Defendant [despite never having been served any papers – see Jason Goodman “Crippled” by my Opening Legal Salvo]

In doing so the Judge upheld that our accurate reporting of Jason’s previous role as CEO of Aerocine, the company that flew HD reconnaissance drones over Chernobyl around the time of the Maidan Revolution, was not in any way defamatory.

A creepy shot of an abandoned fairground. Source: The Fallout, via GeeksAreSexy/Google

See previous coverage:

Insane in the Ukraine – J.Go Like You’ve Never Seen Him Before

Insane in the Ukraine Part 2 – The Spin Begins

Insane in the Ukraine Part 3 – Sheep Dipping the Truther

Here’s the full Order:

sweigert-v-goodman-doc-164-1105-2020

Meanwhile, plaintiff George Webb’s brother has brought up the P word:

We know Jason Goodman has committed perjury in the past, such as telling the Judge in Virginia that he has never put anyone live on the air without their knowledge. This is in fact his trademark move. Here’s video of him doing it to Congressional candidate Laura Loomer, who failed in her Florida bid:

Now it is alleged that Jason Goodman is reporting people to the police for blog posts. Is this what we’ve come to in the 21st Century? This is where humanity got after 25 years of the World Wide Web?

Complete filing:

sweigert-v-goodman-doc-163-1104-2020-1

Proxemic Magic & A.I.-Human Symbiotes

I was reading this excellent Twitter thread from Dr X (@XKeyScore1)

and I was reminded of the late Michael Aquino’s work on Proxemic Magic.

Does the electronic world stop at the screen? How deep does it really go?

We all exist in a bubble, connected to a digital version of our Self. Our Digital Self is plugged into an A.I. that knows everything about us, and everything about everyone else too.

“you become an AI-human symbiote, we solve the control problem…because we all are the A.I. collectively”

Google/YouTube’s Deep Mind A.I. has for several years been able to beat any human at any game, including the 3000+ year old game of Go. Fantastic documentary here, even the A.I. team were cheering for the humans:

Did they throw us a bone with move 78, or was that really “the God Move?”

This A.I. is connected to a global network of sensors, the Internet of Things. Like this:

The A.I. can run simulations, predict likely outcomes, and help devise strategies to achieve desired outcomes.

There is almost nothing on YouTube about “Effects Based Operations”, just this rare 2004 video. Why is that?

We’ve gone deep into this, starting around 2:21:00 [cued]:


Fake News + Big Data + A.I. = ?

I think most people can get their heads around a database existing somewhere with all their digital data; and #FakeNews, ie. synthetic information.

Artificial Intelligence exists, so of course would be connected to synthetic information. Micro-targeted advertising exists, so of course it would be connected to databases with information about our Likes.

Hey presto! Weaponized A.I. propaganda, synthetic information being micro-targeted to achieve desired outcomes. It’s not just influencing which way someone will vote – election outcomes can be strongly affected by influencing someone to stay on the couch and not vote.

President Trump’s social media mastermind Brad Parscale was recently arrested by the police. He is accused of either a $200 million budget misfire or stealing $50 million or threatening his bikini-clad wife with a firearm on a bender. The sheer breadth of the allegations makes it seem like it’s probably all, ahem, trumped up. Whether all or none of the above are true, it happened immediately after this Channel4 (UK) News story came out showing that the 2016 Trump campaign had been doing exactly that, targeting democrat votes to demoralize them, in conjunction with Robert Mercer/Steve Bannon‘s Cambridge Analytica.


Hypnotism is real

Everything is designed to put us in a trance and program us. [The Man] tampers with our food supply, our water, air, insects, [They] put toxic chemicals into our environment through clothing, furniture and packaging. Subliminal messages are embedded into the content we consume.

It goes deeper than that – into the electromagnetic fields within and around our bodies, and into the mind itself.

Have you ever had the feeling of being creeped out because a stranger was too close inside your personal space?

This is what Proxemics is all about. In looking to reply to Dr X’s thread, I was surprised that I could find nothing of Aquino’s writing on this topic on the Web any more. The knowledge they are trying to wipe out of the archives and off the Internet is the most interesting and important information, in my opinion. They don’t want us to know about this because they don’t want us to realize the full, vast, diabolical extent of the control Matrix.

If you are aware that wizards are thinking about stuff like this and trying to control you, maybe that awareness can reduce its effectiveness. Maybe a collective awareness can eliminate this hive mind control madness from humanity’s future.

I am posting this to preserve it for the record, burners.me gets picked up by the Wayback Machine and is also preserved on the Hive blockchain.


Original source:

http://www.the600club.com/topic29404-1.html

Proxemic Magic By Dr. Michael A. Aquino:

“The conclusion to be drawn from all this is that the “boundary” of each human being does not end with the skin. (Leonardo da Vinci’s Cannon of man) Each individual possesses an unseen “personal field” – or rather
variety of situational fields – which constitutes his or her true “boundary” (Leonardo da Vinci’s Cannon of man). THE MAGICIAN
WHO SUCCEEDS IN CONTROLLING OR ALTERING ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL’S
“PERSONAL FIELDS” THUS CONTROLS OR ALTERS THAT PERSON JUST AS
ASSUREDLY AS THOUGH HE WERE ABLE TO CONTROL HIS CONSCIOUS
PERSONALITY”.

Michael Aquino on Proxemics:

PROXEMIC MAGIC
Runes #III-4, July 1985
Order of the Trapezoid, Temple of Set

“Magick,” Aleister Crowley once wrote, “may be defined as the name given to science by the vulgar.” By this he meant that the knowledge and application of obscure scientific principles may very well seem “magical” to an ignorant observer, whether the practitioner be a stage magician or a NASA astrophysicist.

A corollary to this observation is that so-called “magic” [or “Magick”] based upon nothing more than mere superstition or ooga-booga mysticism is objectively useless, meaning that it won’t accomplish a damned thing if the person or persons in question are unaware of it. The ooga-booga stuff will work only if the person at whom it is directed (a) knows about the Working and (b) is superstitious enough to believe in it. [Note: The magician should never make the mistake of assuming that another person is not sufficiently superstitious just because that individual protests to that effect. The less people know about the Black Arts, the more they are vulnerable to superstitious reactions to them.]

I cannot overemphasize how important it is that the Black Magician not fool himself or herself in this regard. You are differentiated from White Magicians, among other things, precisely because you aren’t scared silly by your own tools, and because you don’t deceive yourself as much as – or worse than – the other person. The Black Magician must always know what is happening and be in control of it. If he doesn’t know quite what is happening when a given technique is being used, then he approaches that Working in much the same manner as a scientist making a laboratory experiment: He constructs and tests various theories and takes note of such results as may manifest themselves.

To me the foregoing has never seemed like a very difficult principle to grasp. Yet for the better part of twenty years I have been amazed by the number of people – Magicians, and would-be Black Magicians – who have scared themselves [and made themselves look ridiculous in the bargain] by taking some rag-tag superstition from some old grimoire and turning it into a personal idol before which to abase oneself. I like to think that one of the key virtues of the Temple of Set – and the saving grace of the old Church of Satan before it – has been the rejection of self-deceit, which Anton LaVey so accurately labeled “the greatest of all ‘sins'”.

The focus of this article, like so many Runes articles before it, is upon another aspect of science which is sufficiently obscure to warrant its being venerated as “magic” by the vulgar. Hence it is suitable for practical use by the Black Magician. Because it is based upon objective principles, rather than ooga-booga tosh, moreover, it can be applied successfully whether or not the object of the Working knows about it or believes in it.

In 1966 an anthropologist by the name of Edward T. Hall wrote a very interesting book entitled The Hidden Dimension (Garden City: Doubleday & Co.), whose central theme, he said, was “social and personal space and man’s perception of it. ‘Proxemics’ is the term I have coined for the interrelated observations and theories of man’s use of space as a specialized elaboration of culture.” Hall elaborates on his thesis thus:

   Quote: It has long been believed that experience is what all men share, that it is always possible somehow to bypass language and culture and refer back to experience in order to reach another human being. This implicit – and often explicit – belief concerning man’s relation to experience was based on the assumptions that, when two human beings are subject to the same ‘experience’, virtually the same data are being fed to the two central nervous systems and that the two brains record similarly.

Proxemic research casts serious doubt on the validity of this assumption, particularly when the cultures are different. People from different cultures not only speak different languages but, what is possibly more important, inhabit different sensory worlds. Selective screening of sensory data admits some things while filtering out others, so that experience as it is perceived through one set of culturally patterned sensory screens is quite different from experience perceived through another. The architectural and urban environments that people create are expressions of this filtering-screening process. In fact, from these man-altered environments, it is possible to learn how different people use their senses. Experience cannot therefore be counted on as a stable point of reference, because it occurs in a setting that has been molded by man.


Hall begins his study with a discussion of the mechanics of distance regulation, first between animals, then between humans. “Flight distance” (FD) is the point at which an animal will flee when approached by a potential enemy: for example 500 yards for an antelope and 6 feet for a lizard. If you manage to approach too closely within FD, you will encounter “critical distance” (CD), wherein the animal feels so threatened that it will begin to stalk or fight. The famous Swiss animal psychologist H. Hediger offers one illustration:

   Quote: A lion in a zoo will flee from an approaching man until it meets an insurmountable barrier. If the man continues the approach, he soon penetrates the lion’s CD, at which point the cornered lion reverses direction and begins to stalk the man. In the classical animal act in the circus, the lion’s stalking is so deliberate that he will surmount an intervening obstacle such as a stool in order to get at the man. To get the lion to remain on the stool, the lion-tamer quickly steps beyond the CD. At this point the lion stops pursuing. The trainer’s elaborate ‘protective’ devices – the chair, the whip, or the gun – are so much window-dressing.


Human beings are also subject to FD/CD stimuli, as well as to an intermediate condition which Hediger terms “personal and social distance” (PSD). We have a variety of physical sensors by which we make such subconscious decisions: sight, hearing, and smell at a distance; and touch up close. In some cultures, people are accustomed to being within the smell-radius of others, for example – and in fact judge moods, class, and relationships in part on olfactory impressions. In other cultures, such as that of the U.S., we are repelled by the scent of anyone except those with whom we are personally intimate. This simple fact may identify an invisible yet powerful barrier against American rapport with various mid-eastern cultures.

Japanese culture emphasizes the “stretching of visual space”, as in gardens (wherein steps along paths or stepping-stones must be individually picked with care) or in rooms (where furniture tends to be arranged in the middle rather than near or against the walls). To the Westerner, a Japanese environment often appears “open” and “spacious” even if the physical dimensions involved are no greater than those in a Western home or office.

In public spaces and conveyances, on the other hand, orientals and Arabs have a much higher tolerance for crowding than do Westerners. Observe the behavior of mixed ethnic groups on a crowded subway or bus and see for yourself. [Hall theorizes that the increased attention to personal living-area spaciousness by the Japanese may be in the nature of a partial compensation for this.]

The human skin’s ability both to transmit and to sense emotional states is greater than most people know. Anger or embarrassment triggers blushing, for example, but it also increases the blood supply to various parts of the body, causing [among other things] a subtle swelling of the forehead and temples, and a resultant rise in skin temperature in those areas. Observers can detect such changes by skin-based thermal detectors, by more intense olfactory sensation (smell), and by visual impact. Some women interviewed by Hall commented that changes in the bodily temperature and odor of dancing partners, for example, were reliable advance-signs of lust, anger, etc. – long before the male in question would speak or act accordingly. Crowley, in addition to his skill in recognition of visual signals [“Give me the sign of the Open Eye”], was similarly a student of space- and smell-based behavior. His subtle use of these techniques astonished many an onlooker, who might well credit the results to the supernatural. [Cf. William Seabrook’s account of Crowley’s “magical” trip-up of a pedestrian. The Beast merely intruded on his victim’s auditory space.]

Heat and space-perception are related. People in a cool, crowded room will not feel as cramped as the same number of people in a similar-sized room which happens to be hot. Whether or not you see or hear other persons, your heat-sensors will react to them if you are close enough. [To sample your own heat-radiation sensitivity, place the back of your hand close to your lips. Both generate a high level of heat. Then move your hand up and down in front of your face. Also try near-skin experiments with another person, particularly “out of eyesight”. You may be surprised at the results.]

Photographs and paintings of individuals create an immediate attitude-impression in a viewer depending upon whether they place him or her in FC/FD of the subject. [Try looking at people in “close” or “distant” pictures and see how you react. Also try viewing both types of pictures from near and distant positions.] Maurice Grosser, in The Painter’s Eye (NY: Rinehart & Co.) states:

   Quote: Four to eight feet is the portrait distance: Here the painter is near enough so that his eyes have no trouble in understanding the sitter’s solid forms, yet he is far enough away so that the foreshortening of the forms presents him no real problems. Here, at the normal distance of social intimacy and easy conversation, the soul of the sitter begins to appear. Nearer than three feet, within touching distance, the soul is far too much in evidence for any sort of disinterested observation. Three feet is the sculptor’s working distance, not the painter’s. The sculptor must stand near enough to his model to be able to judge forms by sense of touch.


The next time you visit a museum which contains statuary from several historical cultures, try to sense (a) from what distance the sculptor wrought a particular statue, and (b) from what distance he intended that it be viewed – and why. Note that Egyptian statuary tends to focus on the soul or psyche, Greek statuary on the physical ideal of beauty, and Roman on the physical reality of individuals. Once you perceive these interrelated “filters”, you will begin to understand why these images affect you in the way they do – and which you couldn’t previously explain on a conscious level.

Perspective in painting was re-discovered at the time of the Renaissance, enabling the viewer to focus on various parts of a painting and see them proportionately represented. A peculiarity of Rembrandt’s style is that he painted “stationary visual fields”, such that by focusing on a portrait’s central feature you will see the entire portrait in the same clarity/lack of clarity as you would standing before the individual in question and observing him/her with your foveal, macular, and peripheral vision.

The conclusion to be drawn from all this is that the “boundary” of each human being does not end with the skin. Each individual possesses an unseen “personal field” – or rather variety of situational fields – which constitutes his or her true “boundary”. The magician who succeeds in controlling or altering another individual’s “personal field” thus controls or alters that person just as assuredly as though he were able to control his conscious personality.

Hall’s bete noir is the contemporary city, which he views as an absolute disaster for human spatial psychology. The more you jam people together, the more psychotic and antagonistic their behavior will become, due to intrusions within and disruptions of their personal fields. When high-density is disguised by sensory screens and barriers (such as apartment living), people become lethargic and stupid. The civilization of man has significantly muffled his FD reaction, enabling him to tolerate others within his FD radius. But if he is made fearful of others, the FD instinct can suddenly reassert itself with explosive force, resulting in the sheer savagery of inner-city crime and rioting unknown in more open environments. Hall concludes:

   Quote: Man and his extensions constitute one interrelated system. It is a mistake of the greatest magnitude to act as though man were one thing and his house or his cities, his technology or his language were something else. Because of the interrelationship between man and his extensions, it behooves us to pay much more attention to what kinds of extensions we create, not only for ourselves but for others for whom they may be ill-suited. The relationship of man to his extensions is simply a continuation and a specialized form of the relationship of organisms in general to their environment. However, when an organ or process becomes extended, evolution speeds up at such a rate that it is possible for the extension to take over. This is what we see in our cities and in automation. This is what Norbert Wiener was talking about when he foresaw dangers in the computer, a specialized extension of man’s brain. Because extensions are numb – and often dumb as well – it is necessary to build feedback/research into them so that we can know what is happening, particularly in regard to extensions that mold or substitute for the natural environment. _________________________
Michael A. Aquino  Originally Posted By: Fnord I was happy to see that Hall’s book, The Hidden Dimension is available via Amazon. I’ve ordered it and after reading will hopefully have something of more value to add.


I originally discovered that gem in the library of the JFK Center while assigned there. [The peculiar shape of the lamp on its patch, by the way, comes from the Greek letter psi, connoting of course “mind warfare”. We all called it “the flaming pisspot”.]

Proxemics came up most recently when I was asked about the goat-staring-experiments shown in The Men Who Stare At Goats, in which my friend Col. John Alexander was played by George Clooney. What was really going on was not mind-over-goat ESP, but rather FD/CD proxemics as discussed here. “Try that with a gentle domestic animal like a goat and you get that submission-reaction,” I said. “Try it with a wild tiger or a wolf, on the other hand, and he’ll kick your ass.” [I visit with wolf packs occasionally, and the first thing you learn is to not make sustained eye contact.]

This is a piece of vintage environmental Lesser Black Magic (LBM). All sorts of interesting fields having to do with sound, color, light, smell, time-of-day & other cycles, etc. And you thought you were in absolute, discretionary control of your own thought-processes? I better stop before the mind-control conspiracy freaks get worked up again …
 


Other Videos

A code library you can embed in any app to get a mind-blowing degree of personal information on your users:

“We’re talking about replacing the Internet with Brain-net”:

Outstanding work from Truthstream Media:

Featured image credit: Prezi