LARPWars Part 4 – Was Fox (in Socks) Doxxed, or did Fox Doxx (in Socks)?

LARPWars are the new Meme Wars. Previous coverage:

Part 1 – Proliferation of Lawfare

Part 2 – Moving the Goalposts

Part 3 – ShadowBox

In Part 3 we talked about “Shadow Box”, a “reputation defense” firm created by Well Traveled Fox, Thomas Schoenberger, Defango and Trevor Fitzgibbon. In this post we delve more into the claims made by Fox.


Was Fox Doxxed?

How dare I say I believer her! So outrageous.

In their recent interview, Lestat asked Fox specifically about my claim to have interviewed her extensively, which she dismissed as untrue. She said “he doxxed me and then we exchanged a few DMs, he wanted to know about the Seth Rich files”.

This information is false, and I am forced to respond. Below is my complete interaction with Fox. You be the judge of if this was “just a few DMs” or if my characterization that “I interviewed her extensively” was correct. She is not the innocent and unwitting victim that she tries to portray on social media, far from it. This person connects many of the LARPs together. Is that by accident, coincidence…or design?

Watch what happens with this post – I predict I will be demonized for “attacking” Fox, when all I am doing is sharing her own words that prove that she has been deliberately misleading people about our interactions.

First of all, I never doxxed her. I did not publish any private information that she had not already put in the public domain herself.

When I wrote about Q I didn’t know who this woman was, to me she was just part of the Cicada 3301 crew who were creating ARG puzzles with Thomas Schoenberger and certified IARPA contributor Manuel Chavez III aka Defango aka LARPWars aka MC Dummy Dumb aka Il1usiveMan. Thomas was only somebody I knew because he was doxxed by Defango, who used to work for him.

Fox’s name was brought up by Thomas in his explanation of connections between QAnon and Cicada 3301. I quoted in my story what Thomas told me were some of the Cicada 3301 elements that played into the origins of Q. He listed a bunch of people who were part of his team doing Cicada puzzles. If he was naming people who must not be named, then that’s on him.

You shouldn’t expect the messenger to divine all the subtle nuances and implications of each message. In this case Fox’s claim that nobody knew her identity before I interviewed Thomas is completely false. Here’s the evidence.

When Fox contacted me to object to her first name being in my January 2019 story, I immediately redacted it. I never published her address, phone number, or any other personal information. Her full name and connection to Cicada 3301 has been public since May 2018, as a quick Google search for “Cicada 3301 trademark” reveals.

Note the date of the second one: Dec 4 2018

If it’s fine for her to put her name with Cicada 3301 for official public documents that come up on page 1 of a search, why would I think that she only wants to be known by an alias? Why not use a pseudonym or LLC to file the trademark if secrecy was so important? Still, out of courtesy, I didn’t link to the trademark in that story in order to protect her privacy.

Defango had doxxed Fox in the previous year (2018) with her full name and threatened to ruin the life of her, her husband and her family, all over the Cicada trademark:

Why is Fox more upset with me quoting TS using her first name than with Defango making violent threats to her and her family? That’s a legitimate question to ask, right? Well I’ve asked it, so have others…her response was deleting her Twitter account for the umpteenth time.


#All4aLARP?

For reference, here is the original Q post I wrote in January 2019 featuring these characters:

There is a whole crew of people clustered around Defango who hate Thomas Schoenberger. Some of them now hate Defango too. If you’re on Twitter or YouTube it’s easy to find them. Just like or comment on one of Thomas’s posts and then they will start targeting you too!

I knew when I interviewed Thomas that it would be controversial, and I fully expected attacks as a result of including his version of the narrative. However I never in a million years could have imagined the response that happened. Constant, round the clock attacks every day. Lawsuits. All kinds of character assassination attacks, smears without evidence to the reputation I’ve built over a lifetime. Attacks on my family. Accusations of murder, money laundering, pedophilia. I maybe expected that sort of thing going up against the Burning Man Organization, and indeed experienced a great deal of such lesser black magick warfare. It was nothing compared to what has happened to me merely for sharing Thomas’ side of the story.

I’ve never even met Thomas Schoenberger, yet these people who lived with him, worked with him, financed him, even loved him accuse me of being his “associate, lackey, minion, agent, handler, employer, enabler, colleague”.

The more these people attack me (and many others) for what they define as an “association” with Thomas , the more their true character is on display for the world to see – and showing them to be just as TS described. Even though many of them seem to be vile, spiteful people – literal trolls, many of them ex-cons – there is surely nobody on earth who is consumed with that much malice and misery. There is more going on here. As emotional as many of the attackers are, emotion itself is not their overarching motive. Do you really care about who people you’ve never met are friends with on social media? Whose posts they like? Me neither! So what’s up with these cats?

It is interesting that Defango pushed the same narrative as Fox in response to my first ever Q post: that I doxxed him. He filed a dozen false copyright strikes for clips I edited to show what he said in his own words (so there could be no argument that I was misquoting him). He put his home address on the complaint form to Vimeo, and they sent me an email with that information just as I was publishing the post. I didn’t read the letter far enough to see his details in it, I just copy-pasted it. When he objected, I immediately redacted the address – just as I did with Fox’s name in this post. Technically Vimeo doxxed him, but he freely volunteered the information to them himself and agreed to their terms that it would be shared.

In Fox’s case, I never published her full name, likeness, phone number, address, LinkedIn profile, Facebook account, photographs, family details, or any other personally identifiable information. Just the name “B[REDACTED]” as a quote from Thomas.

In almost 2000 posts on this blog, many of them on controversial topics, many people being upset to have their actions discussed in a critical manner, I’ve never run into this problem before. Just these two people from this one post – which happens to be the first one I’ve ever done on Q. #All4aLARP ?

Here’s the original comment with Fox’s name from her former lover Thomas Schoenberger, sharing his story about the origins of Q.

In the original post instead of [NAME REDACTED] it said “Beth”. That’s doxxing, really?

The argument that merely stating Fox’s first name is doxxing is thrown out by the behavior of Lestat’s mods, who were happy to use her name in the chat of his interview with no reprimand. You can clearly see the double standard: if I say the name they accuse me of doxxing, but when Lestat’s mods Esteban (CIA/DEA), Monkey Savant (known troll), Vinny (Temple of Set) and Diane say it? Everything’s kosher.


Fox Speaks

The following is presented to prove:

  • I’m not making up a claim that Fox put $50,000+ into ShadowBox, that’s what she told me and I verified it – more than once.
  • I interviewed her extensively as I said, not “never” like Lestat claims or “a couple of DMs” like Fox claims.
  • I’ve represented what she told me accurately and never misrepresented any of it.
  • I respected her request to be left alone after someone – maybe Thomas, more likely an enemy of Thomas – attacked her husband’s LinkedIn page by snitching on their love affair.

People need to learn that they can’t lie about me forever without any repercussions. Just because I let them run their mouth off for a while, doesn’t mean I will never respond. I always post evidence, which puts me in a stronger position should any lawsuits arise. Of course, everyone else is invited to post their own evidence – in the comments here, or post it somewhere else and share the link here. I’m happy to be proven wrong, so far in nearly 8 years of writing this blog that hasn’t really happened, despite what you might hear from trolls like Jason Goodman, Jan Irvin, or their psyop sidekick Douglas Dietrich. Is Fox another one of those low-lifes?

As you can see, Fox contacted me specifically in relation to the research I am publishing at this blog. Extensive? Just a couple of DMs? We report, you decide…

She is tired of people making her a character for their narrative. And yet she goes on Lestat’s show to portray me falsely as a fictional villain in his narrative.


I have shared all Fox’s information without editing. I hope you will agree that “interviewed her extensively” was an appropriate characterization.


Fox With Socks Doxxes Socks

As it turns out, Fox was the one working with doxxers:

Bobby “The Lone Cicada” and “Farkness Thee Failmon” above are the same people. This guy brags about his penis size and his fetlife profile, which is perhaps acceptable behavior within the LGBTQI+/BDSM community but not acceptable when speaking to someone who they know is a minor. He is saying that the doxxing information about Mind Inspired and Snow White that he published came from (and was paid for) by Fox.

Thomas’s story has been confirmed to me by both the victims who were doxxed. One is a single mother of young children with an abusive ex. There may have been an emotional motivation behind it:

Both Thomas and Mindy deny any kind of intimate relationship, so this seems like jealousy – which is further confirmation of TS’s claims that he and Fox had an extra-marital affair. Why else would she consider TS’s relationships with others “cheating”? Fox wonders why I consider her a bad person, I’m not sure what her wedding vows were so I’m in no position to judge. Perhaps this was the typical behavior of a good person. I used to live in San Francisco, where more than once a wife introduced me to her husband’s boyfriend or girlfriend. People have open relationships, it’s very European. To each their own. Every Fox has its henhouse.

Thomas has also shared evidence of another minor being targeted by people in this group. A disturbing pattern given that Defango was one of the main people scoffing that #PizzaGate as a LARP and has now teamed up with others who also push that narrative.

Here Defango appears to be stalking a female police officer:

Long after everyone in ShadowBox went their separate ways – on the surface, at least – Fox was still in touch with TS, and seemingly confused:

Manuel Chavez III

Q Part 3: #DefangoLies Again – Origin Myth #TimePhoneHack

Previous Parts:

#QAnon Part 1 Blind Items Revealed – #All4aLARP?

Q Part 2 – Aleksandr Qgin and the Qouncil on National Policy

LARPers gonna’ LARP. Notorious cyber-troll Manuel Chavez III aka Defango aka Fandango is at it again with a new story of the creation of #QAnon, and more evidence that doesn’t stack up to scrutiny.

@fangcrypto is his new Twitter sock puppet account, after his last two got suspended – was it for doxxing, bullying, threatening, hate speech, harassment, or misleading and deceptive conduct this time? Or was it for attacking @pulte and Dilbert creator @scottadamssays trying to put a stop to #TwitterPhilanthropy?

Who knows, but in the time I’ve followed the guy I’ve seen him using at least half a dozen different sock puppets – that we know about. That’s not against Twitter TOS in itself, so why do they always get suspended?

His latest version of his #QAnon origin myth begins at 45:43:

In this telling of events, an account called Flynn L1v3s (Kevin Flynn) sent him a document called Lookout Mountain Wonderland. The document was created in February 2017, 9 months before the start of #QAnon. Its revision history proves that it has never been edited. It contains a bunch of stuff about “Follow the White Rabbit” and is the origin of Q. Two other documents about Alice in Wonderland and John Podesta also support this.

Some of the stories Defango has told in the past about Q are that he created it, that Cicada 3301 did, that Microchip and JB and him (Turdbo) did (now expanded to include Spicci), and even that Jack Posobiec did.

Lately Lestat has been pushing the narrative “General Flynn is Q”, for some reason this gang seems to be very intent on attacking Flynn. General Flynn’s new attorney Sidney Powell has retweeted Q content previously. She is a Senior Fellow at the London Center, along with the original Able Danger Tony Shaffer. #govLARPer Robyn Gritz claimed to be one of these too, although her name has still not appeared anywhere on their web site.

The links between Q, Posobiec, Alex Jones, Bannon, Cambridge Analytica and the Mercers were explored in Q Part 2.

If Defango’s new story is true, then it means that all his previous stories about Q’s origin were lies. Which they were – but that doesn’t prove the new story is true. In fact, it is yet another LARP, easily debunked prima facie.

Defango shows us the date he received the document – Nov 22 2017, almost a month after the birth of Q. The screen when he is showing us clearly shows the document was edited on that date.

Creation date: Feb 28, 2017
Date edited: Nov 22, 2017

Yet Defango shows us the Version history is greyed out. How can that be if it clearly says it was edited on Nov 22 2017?

It seems there are several different ways to alter the version history of a document shared on a Google drive. The version history of a local copy is not the same as the version history of the original document.

We can further prove that Defango is lying about the document being created before #QAnon. There are a number of links to web sites shown in the document. These prove that its content was created after the launch of Q (which was Oct 28, 2017)

note the URLs in the middle of the screen

The closed caption in the picture above shows him saying “so I followed some of the links” – you can see the date of the post, 22 nov 2017, on the screen behind Defango as he is telling us about the great due diligence he did on his new claim. “8 minutes ago” means it’s likely the author of the post is the one who saved it to the archive.

The content itself has been plagiarized directly from Mind Control Black Assassins, a post written February 26 2012. I have an interview with the site’s author PrinceRay coming up in a CryptoBeast podcast episode soon, I will ask him his thoughts about Q. I’m pretty sure he has nothing whatsoever to do with it.

Source: Mind Control Black Assassins, 2012
“the document dates basically don’t lie” – while he is showing URLs created after the document dates

The Voat link shown on the screen goes to a post about what Q revealed the night before!

Posting date: 20 November 2017
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2251391

The Twitter link shown is dated Nov 23-24, 2017.

So it is impossible for what Defango is saying to be true – that the document has not been changed since its creation date. It contains multiple links that did not exist at the creation date.

Defango manages to weave Cicada 3301 back into his narrative, implying that they were the creators of #QAnon and Kevin Flynn was a member of Cicada or an intelligence operative. Note the comment from “Bob Barker”, that Flynn Lives was working with Tracy Beanz and Matt Couch (see LARPWars Part 1 and Part 2 about ShadowBox and Ed Butowsky).

Perhaps Defango is distancing himself from his earlier origin myth stories because his buddies at Maga Coalition have announced their intention to sue Q, after being exposed by the psyop:

Defango shows another document titled Looking Glass.pdf. The date on this one is November 29, 2017, more than a month after Q was launched. He gaslights his audience that this is further “proof” of his latest Q origin story.

Defango says:

“I think I just unloaded something that is gonna really fucking piss off Microchip, and it’s really gonna piss off JB, it’s like I just put my dick in the peanut butter and then the honey and the ants are all around me now”

He claims now that he was set up a patsy, sent to DEFCON to launch a plan that had been developed much earlier: “all they had to do was just fill stuff in because they already had a plan set and they had been planning this shit for months”. This part of it may be true.

For someone who claims to have no ties to the intelligence community, he sure has a lot of ties to the intelligence community:

The Keyhole spy satellite system was acquired by Google and became Google Earth. Its founder John Hanke created Niantic Labs, which launched the Pokemon Go geospatial intelligence project. Defango is referring to a Director of Keyhole, David Lorenzini (spelled incorrectly by Defango), who lives in Scottsdale, Arizona and came into the Gangplank Makerspace where Defango used to hang out. This person would have held the highest level security clearances to have been Director of this project. Maybe even a Q clearance?

The livestream is dated December 15, 2017. Once more, after Q launched.

https://steemit.com/news/@defango/interview-with-bill-maher-of-openbios-david-lornenzini-of-keyhole-google-maps-2018-futures-or-vr-ar-night-gangplank-chandler

The date of this Steemit post is December 16, 2017.

Defango shows another document, also with the versions greyed out and a creation date of Feb 28 2017, which has links to files from the WikiLeaks Vault 7 release of CIA hacking tools.

WikiLeaks had tweeted about this release before that date:

The official release date of their Vault 7 drop was March 7 2017.

Technically it is possible that Wikileaks would have these secret, stolen CIA files just sitting up on their web site for weeks while LARPers like Defango and his mates have access to them and share them on Google drives. However it seems more logical that when Wikileaks publishes something, that is when they put it on their web site – and these links to what they published were added after they published it.

Defango says that “They” (pizzagate researchers?) then planned to “snitch jacket” him as retaliation for blowing the whistle on their Q plans:

He claims that Robert David Steele – another intelligence community member who made multiple appearances on Defango’s channel – was promoting Flynn Lives, but shows a web page where Steele is promoting Timothy Holmseth. Defango then goes on to suggest that Montagraph was correct in saying that Holmseth was really Kevin Flynn.

He then goes on to show evidence completely contradicting this – a Voat post stating that they are two different people.


Conclusion

So what is Defango’s motivation to come out now with a whole different story about #QAnon? Is he trying to make himself out as an innocent patsy, who can turn insider witness to the Maga Coalition lawsuit?

Whatever the reason, the conclusion is obvious: #DefangoLies.


Meanwhile, the Q community is hoping that the rebirth of 8-chan as 8-kun will bring the return of Our Favorite Anon.

Remember that this guy got kicked out of the Army for running a porn site, then moved to the world’s sex trafficking capital the Philippines where he adopted an Asian boy – who is now his chief technical guru “CodeMonkeyZ”.


Related Posts

#QAnon Part 1 Blind Items Revealed – #All4aLARP?

Q Part 2 – Aleksandr Qgin and the Qouncil on National Policy

LARPWars Part 1 – Proliferation of Lawfare

LARPWars Part 2 – Moving the Goalposts

Leppo Aquino PsyopFest – A Review

Michael Aquino, Sammy Davis Jr, Anton Lavey.
Image: VICE

I am starting to do more live streams, seeking a more time efficient way to get my research out and share my opinion on current events using a hypertext multimedia format.

Here is my latest video:

I don’t know anyone else who is combining blog posts, powerpoint slides, and video clips in presenting historical research in this format – either in mainstream channels or where I prefer to be, parapolitics.

Please subscribe to my Vimeo channel CryptoBeast for clips that accompany this blog and my YouTube channel SteveOuttrimCryptoBeast for podcast episodes, livestreams, and other information that may have a wider audience. You can also subscribe to my podcast at Apple iTunes podcasts.

Here is the PsyopFest I am referring to:

It’s a great interview, props to Leppo. If you watch the video of it you will notice him psyopping some of his targets like Truth Convoy. The mere mention of Aquino’s name is triggering to some, as I discuss in my own stream.

I am still working out some of the issues in livestreaming so I couldn’t play some clips during the stream. I don’t have time to edit the video so I am just sharing the clips here, as well as links to some of the information I was talking about.

Please watch the clips because I think they really give a lot of perspective and color to what I am talking about.


Proxemic Magic By Dr. Michael A. Aquino
“The conclusion to be drawn from all this is that the “boundary” of each human being does not end with the skin. (Leonardo da Vinci’s Cannon of man) Each individual possesses an unseen “personal field” – or rather
variety of situational fields – which constitutes his or her true “boundary” (Leonardo da Vinci’s Cannon of man). THE MAGICIAN WHO SUCCEEDS IN CONTROLLING OR ALTERING ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL’S “PERSONAL FIELDS” THUS CONTROLS OR ALTERS THAT PERSON JUST AS ASSUREDLY AS THOUGH HE WERE ABLE TO CONTROL HIS CONSCIOUS
PERSONALITY”.

Wewelsburg Castle, home to the Black Suns Hall of the Dead

Constance Cumbey’s New Age Monitor, June 1986


Previous videos of mine that I referred to:


Documentation

http://aconstantineblacklist.blogspot.com/2007/08/michael-aquino-revisited-was-he-guilty.html

d130017p


Aquino v US Army, Eastern District of Virginia:

http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/768/529/2365140/

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals:

http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/957/139/2044/

I filed 2 FOIAs on his military record, with the assistance of Golden Arrow Research. The second one has much more detail.

Aquino-FOIA

Aquino-FOIA-second-request